#14 in Social psychology & interactions books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of The Science of Good and Evil (Holt Paperback)

Sentiment score: 4
Reddit mentions: 6

We found 6 Reddit mentions of The Science of Good and Evil (Holt Paperback). Here are the top ones.

The Science of Good and Evil (Holt Paperback)
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Gerber short sleeve slip-on shirts provide no-fuss dressing over the head
  • Features a lap shoulder neckline for ease of dressing and finished sleeves
  • They are great to use as a layering piece under your favorite outfits to keep baby's tummy extra warm
Specs:
Height8 Inches
Length5.25 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateDecember 2004
Weight0.6834330122 Pounds
Width0.8240141 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 6 comments on The Science of Good and Evil (Holt Paperback):

u/rookiebatman · 8 pointsr/atheism

Maybe try The Science of Good and Evil by Michael Shermer.

Also, this video might be helpful.

u/[deleted] · 6 pointsr/compsci

I did my undergrad work at UT (BS in CS), and I took a CS ethics class in the spring of '06. This is the class, although I took it with a different prof.

I really loved the class. My prof was a bit eccentric (I can't remember his name at the moment...), and we covered a ton of topics. He was a staunch atheist (at the time, I was a religiously-confused kid that grew up going to a fairly liberal Christian church) and highly encouraged debate. There were some classes where we would debate religion the entire time, and I loved it. I looked forward to the class every time I went.

We spent a lot of time discussing morality and ethics in the more philosophical sense. We read The Science of Good and Evil (and several other books), which made a pretty huge impact on me. The class, although held in the CS department, wasn't in practice really computer science-y. Oftentimes, topics would be related to computer topics (e.g., hacking, human research, what to do in certain hypothetical situations at work), and test questions (which were short essays) often involved hypothetical situations we might encounter.

To date, I still think that was one of the best 2 or 3 classes I took in undergrad. That class is single-handedly responsible for me changing my religious views (I'm an agnostic atheist now). I've always had the need to question everything, but this class made that need explicit.

u/xeriscaped · 5 pointsr/skeptic

One of the problems about Buddhism is the amount of money it seems to suck away from the people who practice that religion. We have family friends in Thailand and Korea who practice Buddhism and both of their families get mad at them because when the Buddhists get some extra money- it goes to their religion instead of saving it for something else (i.e. retirement).

I recommend The science of Good and Evil as a book to consider.

u/LadyAtheist · 2 pointsr/atheism

Bart Ehrman's books & videos are a great start for the accuracy of the Bible. He is very clear especially considering he's an academic. Forged would be the best one specifically about the accuracy of the Bible. His books are linked at his website: http://www.bartdehrman.com/books.htm

There are no historical documents of Jesus' life, only a few references to Christians from later documents. Nobody disputes that people believed in Jesus, so those don't really prove anything. It's clear that people believed in Thor and Zeus too. That doesn't mean a thing.

Whether faith is helpful or good, can't help you there. I think it's totally useless except to control sociopaths with low IQs.

For morality, check out Good without God: http://www.amazon.com/Good-Without-God-Billion-Nonreligious/dp/006167012X

or Sam Harris The Moral Landscape: http://www.samharris.org/the-moral-landscape

Science vs religion: that's kind of apples & oranges despite what believers keep saying. Science is a method of investigating hunches. Religion is subservience to an unproven deity.

How about the science of religion? Try Michael Shermer: The Science of Good and Evil: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0805077693/ or The Believing Brain: http://www.amazon.com/dp/1250008808/ or Why We Believe Weird Things: http://www.amazon.com/People-Believe-Weird-Things-Pseudoscience/dp/0805070893/

Thanks for visiting. An unexamined belief system is not worth believing!

u/Sansabina · 1 pointr/exmormon

Wow, I can relate to your first para. One of the first cracks on my shelf started when sitting in an ancient city and realising there was no evidence the Gospel had ever gone to this ancient empire. It was a pre-eminent civilisation for thousands of years, and no gospel. I then though of all the other ancient civilisations (Chinese, Minoan etc) that all didn't have any idea about the gospel, started to wonder from that point that it might not be true.

I'd recommend this book by Shermer.

Here's a great TED talk by Sam Harris.

and finally an awesome meme.

u/ScottRadish · -3 pointsr/TrueAtheism

sitting around and debating the topic is exactly what I have a problem with. I am in no way qualified to answers these questions, and never claimed to be. I only pointed out that the philosophers aren't qualified either. Since this is /r/trueatheism, can I recommend a few books on the topic? Science of Good and Evil or The Moral Landscape are both good reads, and I think they have advanced the study of Ethics by leaps and bounds.