Reddit mentions of Archetype, Attachment, Analysis: Jungian Psychology and the Emergent Mind

I'm referring to discussion and references found in a book, The Neurobiology of the Gods, primarily but there are others. Jean Knox's text for example, Archetype, Attachment, Analysis: Jungian Psychology and the Emergent Mind, which I'm still making my way through, also updates Jung's theories in relation to contemporary neuroscientific and developmental knowledge.

I'm aware of some texts I haven't got to yet, but others in the sub have more acquaintence with; John Haule's work in Jung in the 21st Century, Vol.1: evolution and Archetype, and Vol.2:Synchronicity and Science is another instance in this territory.

There's a handful of papers floating around also that link to studies associated with Jungian concepts, I don't have those on hand, but as others mention it is difficult to prove Jung's theories in a falsifiable sense; his conceptions arose out of dealing with specific phenomena presented in a clinical setting in his patients or himself (what the Red Book explores). Principally Jung's model is dealing with symbolic and affect oriented phenomena arising interiorly on its own terms while existing as relationally embedded, the spaces and field of what makes up the qualia of subjectivity and what kind of propositional attitudes are adopted therein, not what is able to be measured from a vantage point external to the subjective-locus psychophysically or statistically, or extrapolated from casual cascades of sequalae in a neuroscience context, redirected into that supposed 'objective' space of observation and assessment. Though he deals in binaries, opposites in a dynamic, ultimately his conceptual model collapses those dualities into a 'third' that verges on quantum physics discovery and explication.

The key difference, and significance, with Jung is he doesn't discount those regions of experience and perception that secular science has difficulty with such as the numinous, occult or paranormal phenomena, religious experience and attitude, and so on, as much as neurotic and psychotic disturbance and the 'irrational'. He also approaches and tackles the strangeness of the depths of the entanglement of consciousness with/within matter. There's a usefulness to his concepts that opens up and deepens the world, aiding ones own journey towards healing the rifts and gaps that have ruptured the contemporary person in the midst of the fractured and alienating conditions of a mutated modernity.