#1,808 in Camera accessories
Reddit mentions of Feelworld FW760 7" IPS Ultra-Thin 1920x1200 HD On-Camera Video Monitor HDMI with Histogram, Zebra for DSLR Cameras
Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 2
We found 2 Reddit mentions of Feelworld FW760 7" IPS Ultra-Thin 1920x1200 HD On-Camera Video Monitor HDMI with Histogram, Zebra for DSLR Cameras. Here are the top ones.
or
High Resolution: Full HD 1920x1200,High Contrast: 1200:1,High Brightness: 450cd/m2160°wide viewing angles IPS Panel,Ultra thin design 17mm thickness;HistogramFocus Assist(Red,Yellow,Blue,White four color optional highlight over parts of the image in focus);False Color;Squared segmentation; Embedded audio meter;Camera ModeScan Mode(Over, Under);Zoom(Auto,4x,9x,16x);Anamorphic mode(1.3x,2.0x,2.0x mag);Pixel to Pixel;Center Marker;Safe Area (70%,80%,90%)Marker Type(16:9,4:3,2.35:1,1.85:1);Marker Color(Red,Green,Blue,White,Black,Cyan,Purple,Yellow);Check Field(Gray/Red/Green/Blue);Image Flip (H, V, H/V);Image Freeze;Color Tepm. Adjustment
Specs:
A lot of the comments have talked about prep and scouting. But when you're on vacation -- perhaps family in tow -- that's not always possible.
If that's the case, then do what other people have advised not doing: Take a whole bunch of shots. Experiment.
I'm not saying don't try to visualize shots first, or that you should be completely unprepared. You can scout online if not in person, of course. But if you can't set aside a large chunk of time, then you have to improvise. Try different focal lengths, exposure times, filters and angles as quickly and as best you can in that fleeting golden hour.
At the very least that'll show you what works and doesn't work for next time.
For practice locations, well, I suppose it depends where you live. There are a few outdoor sculpture parks and gardens near me, which are great. Anywhere there's open space is good, even if the view isn't particularly compelling or even interesting. If you're trying to hone your skills then making the most out of a boring subject is better practice than trying to make a thrilling subject look .. more thrilling. (IMO) And I've seen some really interesting compositions of what would otherwise be completely banal subject matter, so you never know.
I've got 2 controversial things to add, in the vein of shooting with heavy time constraints:
A high pixel count is a good thing. Particularly for landscapes, because having some latitude to reframe can strongly improve a composition. (Note I said can, not will. Before people jump all over me, I'm in no way saying that megapixels are the be-all and end-all.)
Also, I've never seen a photographer use one of these, but I've found it immensely helpful (I come from the world of video): An external display. You can get a halfway decent full-HD IPS display relatively inexpensively. (e.g. this Feelworld display ).
Maybe my eye sucks -- and I'm sure people will lambaste me for this -- but reviewing a shot on a 7" or 10" FHD monitor gives me a much better impression of composition, light, and focus than the tiny back-of-camera screen. How many times have you seen a thumbnail of an image and said "ooo!" only to view the image at full size and make a disappointed "oh"? It's faster than transferring them to your laptop, and easier to lug around. And in defense of this, I've never (or rarely, I suppose) seen a filmmaker say "Whatever, it looked OK in the viewfinder. Let's just skip the dailies." For some reason that's seen as a sacrilegious approach to photographers.
oops, sorry man thought i linked it; http://amzn.to/2cjoGkx