#1,043 in Camera accessories
Reddit mentions of Fotodiox Pro Lens Mount Adapter Compatible with Pentax K AF (KAF) Lenses to Nikon F-Mount Cameras
Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 3
We found 3 Reddit mentions of Fotodiox Pro Lens Mount Adapter Compatible with Pentax K AF (KAF) Lenses to Nikon F-Mount Cameras. Here are the top ones.
Buying options
View on Amazon.comor
- Compatible with Pentax K AF (KAF) lenses on Nikon F-mount cameras; Infinity focus allowed – 1.4x optic corrects focus
- Enhanced craftsmanship and high-tolerance construction for demanding professionals; Built-In De-Clicked Aperture Control Dial
- Precise fit and solid connection; lens has no play, gap or wiggling when mounted on adapter and no adjustments required
- Precision all-metal construction with chrome plated brass mounts for secure and solid fit
- Limited 2-Year Manufacturer Warranty
Features:
Specs:
Height | 1 Inches |
Length | 1 Inches |
Number of items | 0 |
Release date | August 2012 |
Size | Pentax K AF |
Weight | 0.220462262 Pounds |
Width | 1 Inches |
> K mount? That won't adapt well to Nikon F mount because it's a shorter flange distance.
>
The adapter I'm looking at is apparently set up to handle that transition specifically. Unless you think this looks like a waste of money?
>I don't think that's a problem. You don't need tone detail in all parts of the fire. If some of it blows out, it shouldn't ruin the shot.
Sorry, I didn't finish my thought there. Or maybe just got confused while I was writing it out. I'm concerned more with the fire itself being reasonably exposed or a bit overexposed with my subject being underexposed as a result. Is that more a situation where I play with exposure compensation until I get results that I'm happy with?
It sounds like setting to spot metering is probably going to be an important first step here, am I right? Thanks for all the help by the way. I've got 1-2 weeks to figure out how this will all work.
> The adapter I'm looking at is apparently set up to handle that transition specifically. Unless you think this looks like a waste of money?
It uses corrective optics to preserve the focusing range. Unfortunately the corrective optics also kill image quality.
> I'm concerned more with the fire itself being reasonably exposed or a bit overexposed with my subject being underexposed as a result. Is that more a situation where I play with exposure compensation until I get results that I'm happy with?
> It sounds like setting to spot metering is probably going to be an important first step here, am I right?
Yes. Then the fire is ignored in the exposure calculation.
I have a macro lens with a Pentax mount, it seems like a pretty good lens but I have a Nikon. Would it be worthwhile to buy something like this or should I just save and by a Nikon macro lens?