Reddit mentions: The best korean war history books
We found 55 Reddit comments discussing the best korean war history books. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 21 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the top 20.
1. On Desperate Ground: The Marines at The Reservoir, the Korean War's Greatest Battle
- Hampton Sides' superb account of this epic clash relies on years of archival research, unpublished letters, declassified documents, and interviews with scores of Marines and Koreans who survived the siege. While expertly detailing the follies of the American leaders, On Desperate Ground is an immediate, grunt's-eye view of history, enthralling in its narrative pace and powerful in its portrayal of what ordinary men are capable of in the most extreme circumstances.
Features:
Specs:
Color | Multicolor |
Height | 9.5 Inches |
Length | 6.5 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | October 2018 |
Weight | 1.7 Pounds |
Width | 1.43 Inches |
2. Colder than Hell: A Marine Rifle Company at Chosin Reservoir (Bluejacket Books)
- FITS WIDE MOUTH LIDS: 10 Reusable Platinum Silicone Discs Make *Wide Mouth* (3" internal diameter and 3.3mm thickness) Ball plastic storage caps, Mason Jar Lifestyle stainless steel storage lids, and some other lids both leak proof and food safe! Not for canning.
- THE SAFEST OPTION: BPA and Plastic Free. Made of platinum cured silicone rubber, these seals are dishwasher, freezer, and microwave safe. Silicone is a safe, green, material for food contact, that does not leach chemicals. Platinum cured silicone is more expensive and higher purity than peroxide cured silicone.
- VERSATILE: Leak Proof, Airtight, Durable, & Better Design Than Competing Products! Perfect for fridge and freezer storage, pantry storage, transporting food or beverage without leaking, and much more! Prevent food contact with plastic or tin, line a straw hole lid for transport, replace your rusted metal flat lids, or line any type of cutout lid for candles or food. Now with a small tab to make them easier to remove.
- MULTI PURPOSE: Work perfectly with metal bands, Ball plastic storage lids, or Mason Jar Lifestyle stainless steel storage lids. Because silicone is a flexible material, they fit some other lids too (but not perfectly). If they seem a little too big for your lid, you can trim them with a scissors.
- COLORADO BASED COMPANY WITH TOP NOTCH CUSTOMER SERVICE: Buy with confidence from this family run, Colorado based business which offers exceptional customer service from our U.S. based Mason jar experts! We strive to delight you!
Features:
Specs:
Release date | October 2012 |
3. Spying on the Bomb: American Nuclear Intelligence from Nazi Germany to Iran and North Korea
Specs:
Height | 9.2 Inches |
Length | 6.1 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | September 2007 |
Weight | 2.23548733668 Pounds |
Width | 1.6 Inches |
4. War and Television (The Haymarket Series)
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9 Inches |
Length | 5.75 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | May 1994 |
Weight | 1.08246970642 Pounds |
Width | 1 Inches |
5. Cold War: A Captivating Guide to the Korean War and Vietnam War
- Data on more than 700 Pokémon!
- Exclusive creator artwork of Mega-Evolved Pokémon and Primal Pokémon and more!
- Crucial information on everything from moves and Abilities to locations and stats!
- Lists of HMs and many other items!
- A guide to how and where to find special Pokémon!
Features:
Specs:
Release date | December 2017 |
6. Fields of Conflict: Battlefield Archaeology from the Roman Empire to the Korean War (Battle Archaeology)
- This electronic game challenges a player to play football against a computer opponent
- The object is to be the team that scores the most points
- Just like the original Mattel Football Game
- Can be played alone or against a friend
- Recommended Age Range 8 and Up
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9 Inches |
Length | 1.25 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Width | 6 Inches |
7. Secrets Of Inchon: The Untold Story Of The Most Daring Covert Mission Of The Korean War
- Shape Your Headband Exactly how you Want it with this Flexible Fabric Covered Wire Headband
- This Red Paisley Headband is a Perfect Hair Accessory for Everyday Wear
- Shape These Bands for a Hair Band, a Wrist Wrap or for a Fun Ponytail Wrap
- This Fantastic Versatile Hair Band Come Flat for You to Shape for Your Own Unique Style
- The Flexible Rust Resistant Wire is Inside the Polyester Blend Fabric
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9.25 Inches |
Length | 6.25 Inches |
Width | 1.5 Inches |
8. A Revolutionary War: Korea and the Transformation of the Postwar World (Military History Symposium Series of the United States Air Force Academy)
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9 Inches |
Length | 6 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 0.85098433132 Pounds |
Width | 0.75 Inches |
9. The Secrets of Inchon: The Untold Story of the Most Daring Covert Mission of the Korean War
- Hampton Sides' superb account of this epic clash relies on years of archival research, unpublished letters, declassified documents, and interviews with scores of Marines and Koreans who survived the siege. While expertly detailing the follies of the American leaders, On Desperate Ground is an immediate, grunt's-eye view of history, enthralling in its narrative pace and powerful in its portrayal of what ordinary men are capable of in the most extreme circumstances.
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9 Inches |
Length | 5.92 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | May 2003 |
Weight | 0.85 Pounds |
Width | 0.88 Inches |
10. Victory Point: Operations Red Wings and Whalers - the Marine Corps' Battle for Freedom in Afghanistan
- DVI-D 24+1 Male to HDMI Female Adapter ennables you to connect a DVI-D 24+1 port eqipped desktop, laptop, video card to a HDMI equipped HDTV, monitor, projector or projector, and support resolution up to 1080P. Pleasse note: This is DVI-D 24+1 adapter, it can also work for DVI-I 24+5 female ports (refer to the second image)
- Support connecting your HDMI-equipped source devices such as your Laptop/ Desktop, Blu-Ray, Xbox 360, PS3, Apple TV, DVD, and Set Top Box to your DVI-enabled HDTV, Displays or Projectors with your existing HDMI cable(not included)
- Support connecting DVI source devices, like Laptop/ Desktop to AV receivers, HDTV and Displays with HDMI interface at high definition
- Fully compatible with all HDTV formats. Supports resolution up to 1080p
- Gold-plated connectors that resist corrosion while offering optimum signal transfer
Features:
Specs:
Color | Multicolor |
Height | 9 Inches |
Length | 6 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | April 2010 |
Weight | 0.85 Pounds |
Width | 1 Inches |
11. U.S. Marine Corps Scout/sniper: World War II And Korea
Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
Height | 0.62992 Inches |
Length | 10.90549 Inches |
Weight | 1.51898498518 Pounds |
Width | 8.50392 Inches |
12. Conflict: The History Of The Korean War, 1950-1953
ISBN13: 9780306807169Condition: NewNotes: BRAND NEW FROM PUBLISHER! 100% Satisfaction Guarantee. Tracking provided on most orders. Buy with Confidence! Millions of books sold!
Specs:
Height | 1.23 Inches |
Length | 8.52 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | August 1996 |
Weight | 1.41 Pounds |
Width | 5.49 Inches |
13. The Korean War: A History (Modern Library Chronicles)
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
Specs:
Height | 8.56 Inches |
Length | 5.75 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | July 2010 |
Weight | 1.06 Pounds |
Width | 0.93 Inches |
14. Breakout: The Chosin Reservoir Campaign, Korea 1950
- Makes 3 Gallons of Port that is Simply AMAZING! - Alcohol by volume: 15% - 16.5%
- Indulge in the classic taste of Chocolate Raspberry
- With notes of warm cherries and plums supported by a racy zing of bright raspberry and luscious chocolate
- This is the flavor you've come to love and it remains unchanged in the new Après brand
- 13X Gold, 16X Silver & 14X Bronze Winemaker International Award Winner
Features:
Specs:
Color | Black |
Height | 1.02 Inches |
Length | 8.41 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | May 2000 |
Weight | 0.9 Pounds |
Width | 5.48 Inches |
15. Korea: The First War We Lost
Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
Height | 9.13384 Inches |
Length | 6.25983 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 0.3196702799 Pounds |
Width | 1.61417 Inches |
17. The Forgotten War: America in Korea, 1950-1953
- Used Book in Good Condition
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9 Inches |
Length | 6.25 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 3.3 Pounds |
Width | 2 Inches |
18. Origins of the Korean War, Vol. 1: Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes, 1945-1947 (Studies of the East Asian Institute)
- New
- Mint Condition
- Dispatch same day for order received before 12 noon
- Guaranteed packaging
- No quibbles returns
Features:
Specs:
Height | 9.25 Inches |
Length | 6 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Release date | October 1981 |
Weight | 1.8 Pounds |
Width | 1.25 Inches |
19. Blitzkrieg to Desert Storm: The Evolution of Operational Warfare
Specs:
Height | 9 Inches |
Length | 6.25 Inches |
Number of items | 1 |
Weight | 1.7747212091 Pounds |
Width | 1.5 Inches |
20. Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century
Used Book in Good Condition
Specs:
Height | 9.5 Inches |
Length | 6.25 Inches |
Weight | 1.32 Pounds |
Width | 1.13 Inches |
🎓 Reddit experts on korean war history books
The comments and opinions expressed on this page are written exclusively by redditors. To provide you with the most relevant data, we sourced opinions from the most knowledgeable Reddit users based the total number of upvotes and downvotes received across comments on subreddits where korean war history books are discussed. For your reference and for the sake of transparency, here are the specialists whose opinions mattered the most in our ranking.
To hit a few that haven’t been mentioned:
Colder than Hell is a pretty good autobiography about Korea.
Semper Fi Vietnam gives a pretty good overview of our actions Vietnam. Made me realize how heavy some of the fighting was, and how inaccurate the popular conception of the war was.
No True Glory and The Strongest Tribe are both pretty good accounts of Iraq. The former mostly deals with Fallujah and the latter with the Awakening.
I'm not an expert, and /u/restrictdata has given a more comprehensive answer than I can, but I would suggest not underestimating the advantage of knowledge diffusion from not being first. A couple points:
China benefited from western-educated scientists that played a key role in developing their weapon. Deng Jiaxian was trained at Purdue University. Peng Huanwu had 2 doctorates from Edinburgh University. Guo Yonguai was educated at U of Toronto, California Institute of Technology, and Cornell. And there are a number of other Chinese scientists that were trained in the west. It's difficult to know exactly how instrumental these people were in developing China's actual weapon, but these individuals became senior scientists in the Chinese program and in the development of an education infrastructure for new nuclear weapons scientists.
Also, despite the fact that the Soviet promised help to China (initially offering very substantial help -- plans, mathematical models, even a 'sample' bomb) almost completely fell apart due to overriding geopolitical relationship issues between the two countries -- at least contemporary U.S. thought was that the Chinese gaseous diffusion plant at Lanzhou shared characteristics with Soviet diffusion plants.
Factual source: Spying on the Bomb: American Nuclear Intelligence from Nazi Germany to Iran and North Korea, Richelson (Amazon Link)
Just read 'On Desperate Ground' 2 weeks ago. About the USMC defense of North Korea. Not sure if you read this yet, but it's pretty good. The Corps at this point had faced almost every enemy and every terrain. Except extreme cold and 250,000 Chinese. At the 'Frozen Chosin', they got introduced to both. They did amazing, but it was too mucb for them. check it out of you get a chance. great book.
Its the 5th grade version because this is a reddit comment and I didn't feel like writing a wall of text. I've read plenty of books on the subject as I find it a fascinating and under-discussed topic.
There were plenty of reasons that led to the actual hostilities, as you have outlined in part above. But the bottom line is that the North invaded the South on June 25, 1950, which began the series of events that brings us to today. What caused the North to take those actions is beside the point, in the end the North was the aggressor. That is black and white.
We seem to be on the same page regarding history, so again I ask, if the North was the aggressor, what is not black and white?
Since we both seem to be interested in the same topic, I'd like to recommend a couple books I have read recently and very much enjoyed, so you can "do some reading":
Conflict: The History Of The Korean War, 1950-1953, by Robert Leckie
The General vs. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War, by H. W. Brands
And if you have any recommendations of your own, I'm all ears, I love a good history book.
Edit: links
I really hope they make a film on ORW2/Whalers. JJ Konstant & Fox 2/3 really deserve to tell the story, as do many.
IIRC Ed Darack's book Victory Point was selected by the Naval Academy as one of the best books of the year 2009
E* Maybe a min-series even w/broader scope
I'd recommend the documentary Korea - The Unknown War. It should be watched in conjunction with Bruce Cummings' book War and Television, which is largely about the process of making that documentary.
Once you realize how much propaganda affects even attempts to present a balanced view of the DPRK, you'll start to understand just how important the demonization of the DPRK is to the American-psyche. It's pretty much required to even have a positive view of America at all that the DPRK must be demonized, and the influence is so strong it even affects documentaries made in Britain.
Here are all the local Amazon links I could find:
amazon.co.uk
amazon.ca
amazon.com.au
amazon.in
amazon.com.mx
amazon.de
amazon.it
amazon.es
amazon.com.br
amazon.nl
amazon.co.jp
Beep bloop. I'm a bot to convert Amazon ebook links to local Amazon sites.
I currently look here: amazon.com, amazon.co.uk, amazon.ca, amazon.com.au, amazon.in, amazon.com.mx, amazon.de, amazon.it, amazon.es, amazon.com.br, amazon.nl, amazon.co.jp, if you would like your local version of Amazon adding please contact my creator.
http://www.amazon.com/Korean-War-History-Library-Chronicles/dp/0679643575
is supposed to be good. mediocre Amazon reviews probably because it is not complimentary of the US role.
quick blog review of it from Marginal Revolution
http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2010/08/the-korean-war.html
A quarter of the way through this:
On Desperate Ground: The Marines at The Reservoir, the Korean War's Greatest Battle
This is an amazing book about the breakout from the Chosin Reservoir. God, what a hard battle that was.
Looks like revised estimate (~+300k) from Krivosheev
Battlefield archaeology was a huge help to me. You don't' realize how little we actually know until you understand how we learned what we do know.
http://www.amazon.com/Fields-Conflict-Battlefield-Archaeology-Empire/dp/B004JZWMEY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1303281148&sr=8-1
The true story of Commander Eugene F. Clark, USN scouting Inchon Harbor just prior to MacArthur's amphibious invasion would make a fantastic action-packed miniseries or movie. The epic ending every screenwriter dreams of.
Immediately after the war, Clark wrote a 300+ page memoir of the mission. Discovered by his kids after his death and published: The Secrets of Inchon - The Untold Story of the Most Daring Covert Mission of the Korean War
From the back of the book:
>Retrieved from the safe-deposit box, this stunning firsthand account of a crucial, but little-known, covert mission of the Korean War offers an honest, revealing, and remarkable story of wartime courage-from the very man who led the mission.
>According to colleagues, Commander Eugene Franklin Clark had "the nerves of a burglar and the flair of a Barbary Coast Pirate." And in August, 1950, when General Douglas MacArthur made the unpopular decision to invade Inchon-a move considered by many to be tactical suicide-he sent in Clark to find out what they needed to know.
>Discovered by North Koreans, he soon found his intelligence gathering interrupted by firefights, air raids, hand-to-hand combat, and even a small-scale naval battle. Culminating in the night of the invasion, Clark's account, informed by a growing brotherhood with his newfound allies, is rich in both adventure and humanity.
>Eugene Clark served in the Navy during World War II, and after the war, among other assignments, was attached to General Douglas MacArthur's G-2 (intelligence) staff in Tokyo. He was there when the Korean War began, and was approached for the Inchon mission. For his role in the invasion, he won the Silver Star, and the Far Eastern Command added the Legion of Merit for "exceptionally meritorious conduct." Later missions resulted in an Oak Leaf Cluster and the Navy Cross. Clark died in 1998, after retiring from the Navy in 1966 with the rank of commander.
On my bookshelf, this book stands between Lawrence of Arabia and The Old Breed. One of the very best, but least known, firsthand war accounts.
It is
https://www.amazon.com/002-Revolutionary-Transformation-Military-Symposium/dp/1879176165
Still, it's a cool picture
You need to buy this and read it.
https://www.amazon.ca/U-S-Marine-Corps-Scout-Sniper-World/dp/1581605277
If anyone wants to read a book about what actually went down during Operation Redwings here you go.
https://amazon.com/gp/product/042523259X/
> There is no alternate view to that event.
Are you so naive? Please read Bruce Cumings ( a well respected historian of korean war from University of Chicago) Origin's of Korean War[1].
1.http://www.amazon.com/Origins-Korean-War-Vol-Liberation/dp/0691101132
Hey I am back, and here are the sources you asked for. First one is from wikipedia though I would point out that apparently citations are needed for the section in question.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_losses_in_World_War_II#Land
The wiki gives about 42,000 losses of T-34s
Here is another from a blog that uses this book as a source.
http://chris-intel-corner.blogspot.com/2012/07/wwii-myths-t-34-best-tank-of-war.html
They give 44,900 losses
And another which also gives 44,900 as the total losses:
http://www.operationbarbarossa.net/the-t-34-in-wwii-the-legend-vs-the-performance/#Conclusions%20Regarding the T-34’s Overall Performance as a ‘War Winner’
Here is a discussion of casualty figures from Zaloga, and from the author of the book I linked:
http://www.dupuyinstitute.org/ubb/Forum5/HTML/000024.html
I admit I rounded up to 45,000 when I made the album.
Hope that was helpful!
I'm going to post this here for anybody else who might be interested.
The Trident by Jason Redman - Autobiography of a SEAL who fucked up majorly and repeatedly (he ragequitted US Ranger course after being sent there as a "punishment" for a previous mistake), then came back from it. If you've heard of the story about the note outside the hospital ward which goes like, "do not come into this room to pity me", it's this guy.
SEAL Team Six by Howard E. Wasdin - One of a handful (two?) of SEALs who participated in the infamous Operation Gothic Serpent and Battle of Mogadishu. Despite all the experiences, he says the biggest success over there was when he defied orders in order to treat a child's rotting leg.
And of course, Lone Survivor by Marcus Luttrell. Do take note that he has been criticized for many inaccuracies in the book, and the general consensus seems to be that a more reliable account would be Victory Point.
A few anecdotes:
Lt. Michael Murphy, while severely wounded from falls, cuts, gunshots, and shrapnel, and having lost two of his men, made a satellite phone call for help in an open area exposed to gunfire. He finished the call with a "thank you".
Marcus Luttrell received a service dog to help grief his fallen teammates. The dog's name was formed by combining the initials of his teammates. That dog was shot dead, for fun, by a bunch of young punks who didn't know who its owner was. He chased them in his truck across the state and when he finally caught up with them, he handled the situation professionally, even though he was armed and completely capable of laying the smackdown on the punks for shooting his dog.
http://www.amazon.com/Breakout-Chosin-Reservoir-Campaign-Korea/dp/0140292594
Talk about hell on Earth.
Here are my recommendations for readings on Korean history. The list is somewhat heavy on Chosŏn (1392-1910) history mainly because it is my main research interest. If you are interested on more readings on Chosŏn history, feel free to shoot me a message.
Textbook Histories
Academic Monographs
Primary Sources
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purge_of_the_Red_Army_in_1941
https://www.historynet.com/stalin-attacks-red-army.htm
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties_of_the_Soviet_Union
Incompetent leadership, disease, frostbites killed more people in the Eastern Front than soldiers killing each other. This book pretty much covered it
The USA already fought a war supporting South Korea, and the war between both Korean sides actually has never officially stopped.
It was the first war the USA did not win.
And the border between the two Koreas has the bigger concentration of landmines in the world.
This is by far the best book I have read on the Korean War and is definitely in my personal top five favorite war books: Breakout: The Chosin Reservoir Campaign, Korea 1950
The book gives a historical account of Chosin Reservoir Campaign in which 12000 Marines + personnel broke out of an encirclement by some odd 60 000 Chinese troops.
It goes into detail and provides first person accounts of the campaign by different Marines as well as an overview of the whole campaign.
If you're a military history buff, you need to read this book.
I won't give away how awesome the book is, but in one instance it gives an account of a Marine who, having expended all his ammunition cutting down a wave of Chinese, picks up an M1 Garand w/ fixed bayonet and hurls it into the chest of a final enemy soldier who was about to over run his foxhole. I couldn't put the book down after that.
It amazes me that many people do not even realize that the Chinese and the Americans actually killed each other in combat in the 20th century. The Korean War is the most overlooked conflict in recent times.
I must hold back the Chinese fan boy in me. Keep in mind this is a pan-Asian sub. We built this place to bring all Asians together. Talking up our Asian superiority is fine, but never alienate our Asian bro and sis[s].
 
The sources you were referring to
Africa - https://np.reddit.com/r/CIWO/comments/3o7faq/china_is_colonizing_africa/
India 1962 border war - https://np.reddit.com/r/CIWO/comments/3o7i2f/china_waged_a_border_war_against_india_in_1962/
Tibet - https://np.reddit.com/r/CIWO/comments/4vmr9c/tibetan_genocide/
Penis - https://np.reddit.com/r/CIWO/comments/3pj0d6/small_penis_stereotype/?ref=search_posts
 
Pollution [thought you might want this. USA pollutes at 4x the rate per capita despite China developing and being the world's factory lol] - https://np.reddit.com/r/CIWO/comments/3o7gf0/china_is_the_biggest_polluter_in_the_world/
 
Korean War quotes. These will serve you well.
>Panic among troops during wartime is common. In the early months of the Korean War, many U.N. troops were gripped by panic described as "bug out fever." Many frightened soldiers ran away rather than staying and fighting. They left behind their wounded comrades, their weapons, and anything else that might slow them down.
The Korean War: America's Forgotten War p.27
 
>In late 1952, the U.S. 2d Division compiled a volume of data on the Chinese in battle, which the Eighth Army considered worth reproducing. The following excerpts are from this study...[sic] The Report then sums up:
>
>The Chinese soldier is not a superman. He is well and courageously led at the small unit level and the results of actions at this level offer definite proof that he is thoroughly disciplined. His industry is shown by his thorough fortifications. His conduct of the defense is accomplished in spite of UN air superiority, UN liaison aircraft, lack of his own liaison aircraft and inferior communications equipment. He is operating on a shoestring basis as is evidenced by the hodge-podge of equipment picked up on the battlefield after every encounter.
>
>To these encomiums might be added the observation that the enemy was not only brave and resourceful, but also tough.
>
>Growing up in an underdeveloped nation, where famines were common, the Chinese could subsist on very little and endure great privation...
>
>Pitted against against opponents who had attained a high degree of technological skill and who were able to bring superior materiel into play against them in the air, on the ground, at sea, and in matters of communication and transportation, they still managed to hold their own by the prodiious use of manpower...
TRUCE TENT AND FIGHTING FRONT p.511
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0084FXCF8
 
Imperial Japan was the West's creation
>China is confronted with two very different groups of foreign Powers, on the one hand the white nations, on the other hand Japan. In considering the effect of the white races on the Far East as a whole, modern Japan must count as a Western product; therefore the responsibility for Japan's doings in China rests ultimately with her white teachers.
Source: The Problem of China by Bertrand Russell
 
Review of your post: There is some exaggeration, but relatively speaking yes, Asians and especially the Koreans are very peaceful compared to the West. They are more inclusive, maybe not open borders inclusive, but will not murder you with humanitarian intervention inclusive.
 
China and East Asians have problems with gambling, extreme patriarchy in some regions [improving though], arrogance, greed, corruption, excessive focus on status/money leading to under-utilized creativity, but these are minor problems when it comes to world governance [except the corruption and greed parts. those must be kept in check]. Where the West excels is in its daring, which I think is also why there are higher rates of psychopathy. Hopefully, Asians can change culturally a bit to embrace a more open-minded approach and be less instantly judgmental. Not everything has to make us high status and rich. My biggest concern is that should Asia lead, they must never share potentially powerful tech. I don't want to ever see a gunpowder 2.0 fall into the West's hands again.
Ugh, not at my fingertips. Wikipedia gets its source here. The battlefield was larger than many European countries and the scale boggles the mind. According to the estimates, the Soviets lost more tanks than they started the battle with.
To hang all tank losses on any one individual is rather
trenchanttendentious, though I don't know who would be a likelier target than Zhukov.I think of Kursk as the high point of "total conventional war" doctrine. It didn't really have anywhere to go after that and I notice that superpowers lost all vigor for fighting each other since then.
EDIT: Trenchant is the wrong word.
The most comprehensive source on this is Krivosheev's Grif sekretnosti snyat, which has figures for all Russia's/USSR's 20th century conflicts with WW2 of course being most prominent among them. Here is the text in Russian, the WW2 chapter is the fifth one; the wealth of information is summarized in the tables, and I think you'd be able to get at most of it via Google Translate. (The book has an English translation, but appears to be both abridged and highly expensive to boot).
As for your specific question, the answer is - not long. As was pointed out, 1941 was an extremely deadly year, accounting for slightly more than 25% of total irrecoverable despite being only half a year. 1942 - another 25%. So, ~55% in 1941-42. The statistically most likely fate for a soldier called up in 1941 was to be captured in one of the great encirclement battles, and die in a Nazi PoW camp. If he survived through to 1943, his risk profile would slowly converge and, from 1944, begin to look better than his equivalent in the Wehrmacht. In particular, his risk of capture would drop dramatically henceforth; the risk of being killed would substantially fall, though it would still remain extremely high relative to most armed conflicts; and his risk of getting wounded would start exceeding the risk of getting killed by several factors (a high WIA-to-KIA ratio is a sign of a well organized military).
Also worth pointing out that risk profiles differed quite radically for different branches of the armed forces. I don't recall the source, but I remember reading an estimate of "life expectancy" (that is, from induction until KIA/MIA/WIA/POW) in 1941 for them: It was around 3 months for infantry vs. 3 years for artillerymen, with intermediate numbers for tank men, airmen, etc.
> if you haven't read up on the "Chosin Reservoir" you motherfucking need to. 15,000 marines were surrounded by some (50,000?) Chinese and fought their way out in the most horrible of conditions.
Regarding Chosin, I feel compelled as an Army veteran to recommend two books on the subject of the Battle of Chosin, and the Korean War in general: East of Chosin by Roy Appleman details the experiences of the Army 7th ID's RCT-31 in defending the Marines' right flank, and The Forgotten War by Clay Blair jr. Both texts avoid the perpetuation of the myth that RCT-31 displayed cowardice at Chosin. For many years after the battle, USMC "middle management" allowed their parochialist dislike of the Army to color their interpretation of RCT-31's actions at Chosin to the point of accusing them of throwing down their weapons and running away from the Chinese. In reality, RCT-31 was massively outnumbered and lost a majority of its personnel as wounded and KIA in keeping the Chinese from advancing down the east shore, and the few combat-ready survivors, reduced from a regiment to a mere battalion, fought right alongside the 1st Marine Division in the breakout.
After the war, what the Japanese did was mostly ignored, and communism became the new scary boogieman. The biological weapons created and used by the Japanese were hushed up, and because orientals were discriminated against in the US, and oriental languages were rarely taught in schools, it was very hard for what was happening in Asia to get to the media, or even common people.
Two books that can probably be found in your local library are:
The Korean War: A History
Korea's Place in the Sun
The response by the US to the Korean War was to drastically raise the amount of military spending (which had dropped to almost nothing after WW2) and this rise of the "military industrial complex" drove all the subsequent wars. Cumings is rather controversial for making the claim that the Korean War was the most important war that the US ever fought, as well as being controversial for not calling the North Koreans total loonies.
If you look at current NK propaganda, you'd think that they were still at war with Japan and the US. The NK regime considers their beginning about a decade prior to the semi-official recognition of NK being a country because 1937 is when the Kim family started fighting the Japanese - who had been occupying Korea with the blessing of the west for more than a quarter century.
Here what I've picked up
On War by Clausewitz
MCDP 1 Warfighting
FMFRP 12-18 Mao Tse-tung on Guerrilla Warfare
FMFRP 12-13 Maneuver in War
On Grand Strategy
The Art of War by Baron De Jomini
Just and Unjust Wars (apparently it's on the Commandant's reading list too)
Soviet Military Operational Art: In Pursuit of Deep Battle
Out of the Mountains: The Coming Age of the Urban Guerrilla
Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century
The Bear Went Over the Mountain: Soviet Combat Tactics in Afghanistan
Blitzkrieg to Desert Storm: The Evolution of Operational Warfare
Why Air Forces Fail: The Anatomy of Defeat
Deep Maneuver: Historical Case Studies of Maneuver in Large-Scale Combat Operations (Volume 5)
JP-1 Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States
DoD Law of War Manual
The Soviet Army: Operations and Tactics
Black Flags: The Rise of ISIS
Napoleonic Warfare: The Operational Art of the Great Campaigns
The Air Force Way of War: U.S. Tactics and Training after Vietnam
Strategy: A History
LikeWar: The Weaponization of Social Media
The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World
MCTP 3-01C Machine Guns and Machine Gun Gunnery
Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis
The U.S. Army in the Iraq War – Volume 1: Invasion – Insurgency – Civil War, 2003-2006
The U.S. Army in the Iraq War – Volume 2: Surge and Withdrawal, 2007-2011
Illusions of Victory: The Anbar Awakening and the Rise of the Islamic State
Concrete Hell: Urban Warfare From Stalingrad to Iraq
The American Way of War: A History of United States Military Strategy and Policy
Supreme Command: Soldiers, Statesmen, and Leadership in Wartime
This is all I can name off the top of my head right now