Reddit mentions: The best anthropology books

We found 41 Reddit comments discussing the best anthropology books. We ran sentiment analysis on each of these comments to determine how redditors feel about different products. We found 23 products and ranked them based on the amount of positive reactions they received. Here are the top 20.

1. A History of Archaeological Thought: Second Edition

    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
A History of Archaeological Thought: Second Edition
Specs:
Height9 Inches
Length6 Inches
Weight2.14289318664 Pounds
Width1.65 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

3. Urban Life: Readings in the Anthropology of the City

Used Book in Good Condition
Urban Life: Readings in the Anthropology of the City
Specs:
Height9 Inches
Length6 Inches
Weight1.35 Pounds
Width1 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

4. Being Alive

Routledge
Being Alive
Specs:
Height9.69 Inches
Length6.85 Inches
Weight1.04940036712 Pounds
Width0.65 Inches
Release dateMay 2011
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

5. The Wayfinders: Why Ancient Wisdom Matters in the Modern World

Used Book in Good Condition
The Wayfinders: Why Ancient Wisdom Matters in the Modern World
Specs:
Height8.25 Inches
Length5.13 Inches
Weight0.68 Pounds
Width0.7 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

6. Anthropology: Appreciating Human Diversity

Anthropology: Appreciating Human Diversity
Specs:
Height10.8 Inches
Length8.5 Inches
Weight3.06001619656 Pounds
Width0.9 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

7. Sociological Theory

    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
Sociological Theory
Specs:
Height8.999982 Inches
Length5.999988 Inches
Weight2.6786164833 Pounds
Width1.401572 Inches
Number of items3
▼ Read Reddit mentions

8. Anthropology: What Does It Mean to Be Human?

Anthropology: What Does It Mean to Be Human?
Specs:
Height8.4 Inches
Length10.9 Inches
Weight2.40744790104 Pounds
Width0.8 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

9. Watching The English

Orders are despatched from our UK warehouse next working day.
Watching The English
Specs:
Height7.79526 Inches
Length5.82676 Inches
Weight0.88625829324 Pounds
Width1.49606 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

12. War: What is it good for?: The role of conflict in civilisation, from primates to robots

War: What is it good for?: The role of conflict in civilisation, from primates to robots
Specs:
Height9.4488 Inches
Length6.37794 Inches
Weight1.7416498 Pounds
Width1.69291 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

13. Apocalyptic Grace: The Evolution Of Culture And Consciousness

Apocalyptic Grace: The Evolution Of Culture And Consciousness
Specs:
Height9 inches
Length6 inches
Weight0.89066753848 Pounds
Width0.62 inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

14. Sulod Society: A Study in the Kinship System and Social Organization of a Mountain People of Central Panay

Sulod Society: A Study in the Kinship System and Social Organization of a Mountain People of Central Panay
Specs:
Height8.75 Inches
Length6 Inches
Weight0.9 Pounds
Width0.75 Inches
Release dateJuly 2009
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

15. The Nervous System

The Nervous System
Specs:
Release dateSeptember 2012
▼ Read Reddit mentions

17. Anthropology: What Does it Mean to Be Human?

Anthropology: What Does it Mean to Be Human?
Specs:
Height8.5 Inches
Length10.8 Inches
Weight2.72 Pounds
Width0.7 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

18. Revel for Human Evolution and Culture: Highlights of Anthropology -- Combo Access Card (8th Edition)

Revel for Human Evolution and Culture: Highlights of Anthropology -- Combo Access Card (8th Edition)
Specs:
Height11 Inches
Length8.5 Inches
Weight0.03 Pounds
Width0.06 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

19. Sociology: The Core, 11th Edition

    Features:
  • Used Book in Good Condition
Sociology: The Core, 11th Edition
Specs:
Height9 Inches
Length7.3 Inches
Weight1.75487960552 Pounds
Width0.9 Inches
Number of items1
▼ Read Reddit mentions

🎓 Reddit experts on anthropology books

The comments and opinions expressed on this page are written exclusively by redditors. To provide you with the most relevant data, we sourced opinions from the most knowledgeable Reddit users based the total number of upvotes and downvotes received across comments on subreddits where anthropology books are discussed. For your reference and for the sake of transparency, here are the specialists whose opinions mattered the most in our ranking.
Total score: 5
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 4
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 4
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 4
Number of comments: 1
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 3
Number of comments: 1
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 2
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 2
Number of comments: 2
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 2
Number of comments: 1
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 1
Number of comments: 1
Relevant subreddits: 1
Total score: 1
Number of comments: 1
Relevant subreddits: 1

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Top Reddit comments about General Anthropology:

u/killthebillionaires · 2 pointsr/Anarchism

you may want to check out The Anthropology of Freedom if this topic interests you.
are you free if you are born in a giant pit in the ground in which you can do anything you want to, but with no ladder to get out?
true freedom requires the scaffolding necessary to climb to your highest aspirations.
If you love playing the violin and want to become the world's best violin player, you will need someone who wants to make violins, someone who wants to chop wood to provide the violin maker with material, and a violin teacher to give you lessons. without that scaffolding you cannot be free to become the best violin player you can be. not to mention the things everyone needs to be free--freedom from violence or abuse, socialization and social relationships, food, shelter, water, etc... all of which are necessary for you to be alive and psychologically healthy enough to be able to pursue your passions and desires.
like lil wayne says:
"But they talked that freedom at us
And didn't even leave a ladder, damn"

u/GingerAnthropologist · 11 pointsr/pics

In addition to the photos from the TED talk OP shared, there is an older TED talk by Robert Neuwirth on squatter cities.

http://www.ted.com/talks/robert_neuwirth_on_our_shadow_cities

His book, Shadow Cities, is pretty interesting. Not heavily academic and he does miss a lot, though his observations and stories on the cities he goes to are the best part. One of my favorite ones to read about was the Turkish community of Sultanbeyli. A small squatter area that transformed and if I remember right, created it's own infrastructure.

Edit: Link to book. http://www.amazon.com/Shadow-Cities-Billion-Squatters-Urban/dp/0415933196

Edit 2: Because I get too excited about the subject and go off on others, a really great book to dig deeper into the subject of urban studies is Urban Life: Readings in the Anthropology of the City by Gmelch, Kemper, and Zenner. Read it for one of my graduate courses recently and loved it. Looks at life in cites on different levels, so it's not just squatter cities. One of my favorite parts was on migration and Mexican communities in the United States.
http://www.amazon.com/Urban-Life-Readings-Anthropology-City/dp/1577666348/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1397186036&sr=1-1&keywords=Urban+Life

u/ajantis · 3 pointsr/askphilosophy

Philosophy of mind addresses some of these issues under the heading of intentionality.

In (continental) humanities side of things, sociology of emotions and affect theory is so in vogue recently that some scholars already identified as a turn. The focus and approaches vary but one influential strand of thought takes Spinoza-Deleuze's "affect" as a central concept and separates it from emotion. I won't get into details but basically "affects" are about physical bodies' capacities to act and be acted on. For that reason the term abolishes the distinction between physical and mental effects and covers them both. Brian Massumi is maybe the most influential thinker in affect theory who refined the concept of "affect" and put it in context of broader discussions.

The indispensable resources are:

Gregg and Seigworth. The Affect Theory Reader

[Clough and Halley. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social] (http://www.amazon.com/Affective-Turn-Theorizing-Social/dp/0822339250/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375771321&sr=1-1&keywords=affective+turn)

[Brian Massumi. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation] (http://www.amazon.com/Parables-Virtual-Sensation-Post-Contemporary-Interventions/dp/0822328976/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1375771409&sr=1-1&keywords=parables+of+virtual)

Not known that much outside of anthropology but this is very good too: Tim Ingold. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description

u/Pachacamac · 10 pointsr/AskHistorians

I can't really delve into any detail, but basically archaeology didn't really become a thing until the mid-19th century. Antiquarianism was around for about 100 years before that, but it was really just about collecting interesting things as historical relics, and not about scientific inquiry or trying to understand the past through archaeological sites and artifacts. It's not that people did not care about archaeological sites, but rather that they just saw them as ruins or old buildings and did not really see them as important places for learning about who and what came before. They may not have even recognized them as ancient places at all.

The case in Italy must surely be different because the history of the Roman empire was well known by 1700 and people must have known that these ruins were built during the Roman Empire, but I don't know much about Italian archaeology or its history. In other parts of the world places that are now considered archaeological sites probably were not seen as anything special and were not recognized as the ruins and artifacts of societies that came thousands of years before. At least not in Western thought; I can't speak for how non-Western people viewed such ruins.

I've also heard that until the 19th century there was no true concept of the passage of time in Western thought. There was the Biblical age, the Classical age, and the modern age; that was it, the world would then end. People of course experienced lifetimes and knew that time passed, but there was no sense of any real change or that a stone celt was actually made by a pre-Biblical culture 8,000 years ago. That concept of long-term change and abandonment just didn't exist, and certainly the concept of deep time did not exist (until the 19th century people knew that the Earth was ~6000 years old). I find this concept very hard to wrap my head around, but that's because I've grown up in a world where deep time exists and things are always changing.

A great source for all this is Bruce Trigger's "A History of Archaeological Thought". The first two or three chapters go over the early development of antiquarianism and archaeology, and how Western thought changed to allow for deep time and the recognition of non-Western pasts (the rest of the book is about how thought within the discipline has changed over the 20th century). Trigger was a true master of archaeology and although this book is long and kind of dense, it is also very accessible to a non-specialist.

You might also find Barbara Bender's "Stonehenge: Making Space (Materializing Culture)" interesting. It is about Stonehenge, obviously, and about how the public perceives and uses Stonehenge. She talks about the history of Stonehenge as a monument, too, including some descriptions of it in the 12th or 13th century A.D. I can't remember exactly what she said about how it was viewed then, but I remember it being very interesting and pretty different from how it is perceived today.

u/AnyaSatana · 2 pointsr/CasualUK

I can recommend a book to you that might help, Watching the English by Kate Fox. She's a British anthropologist, and applies it to her own culture. It's really interesting to see why we behave the way we do and the "rules" of our behaviour.

u/bitterglitter · 1 pointr/AskReddit

I also highly recommend The Wayfinders - part of the (I think) 2009 CBC Massey Lecture series.

The first or second chapter (it's been about a year since I read it) concentrates on the Micronesian navigating culture.

Great read!

u/meriti · 2 pointsr/AskAnthropology

I am currently advocating to my college to change the Intro to ANthropology book to this one. It is a textbook and it might be on the expensive side, but it has a chapter that is great on Economic Anthropology.

I would suggest the following:

The world of goods: towards an anthropology of consumption

The full book of "Theory in economic anthropology" edited by Jean Ensminger. -- this one's an introduction book-- Here's a chapter

Another Economic Anthropology guidebook: Economies and Culture (Wilk and Cliggett 2007)


Richard Lee's and Marshall Sahlin's work, including "Stone Age Economics" (Sahlins, 1972)

u/foretopsail · 3 pointsr/askscience

This gets asked every so often, and these are the books I usually recommend for someone wanting to know what's up with archaeology. Start at the top, and keep going down if you're interested. There are many more, but I like these.

u/emtilt · 3 pointsr/Anthropology

One approach would be to search for syllabi for undergraduate anthropology courses and see what texts they require. Then you could work through different "courses" on your own.

For example, an older edition of this book was used in my intro to anthro course when I was an undergrad. Something like it or one of its competitors might be a good place to start. If you live in a metropolitan area, I'm sure your public library has plenty of books to get you started.

u/katerader · 6 pointsr/Archaeology

I'm not sure of anything like what you're looking for, but Trigger's History of Archaeological Thought is a pretty decent all around guide to the development of archaeological theory, though it tends to be more US-focused. http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0521600499

u/Jazvolt · 3 pointsr/Archaeology

Here's another good one: http://www.amazon.ca/History-Archaeological-Thought-Bruce-Trigger/dp/0521600499

It has a large section on post-processualism in reference to other paradigms of archaeological thought. Good book to own for archaeologists in general.

u/Dangger · 2 pointsr/sociology

Ritzer has some very good introductory texts to sociology like Sociological Theory

u/Blackboxbrownstrip · 1 pointr/booksuggestions

That's not the book you are looking for.

This is the perfect book for you.
https://www.amazon.com/Humans-beginning-first-apes-cities-ebook/dp/B00IS80QWI

u/Khayembii · 1 pointr/history

Here are two good sources to start with. The former contains primary documents (including an explanation of the KR's plans for rapid industrialization) and the latter is a history and analysis of the Khmer Rouge:

Pol Pot Plans the Future: Confidential Leadership Documents from Democratic Kampuchea, 1976-1977
Cambodia Communism and the Vietnamese Model

u/CuriousastheCat · 1 pointr/history

Something a bit different to the 'here are the weapons/tactics' used approach but very well reviewed (full disclosure: on my shelf but not reached it yet!)

​

https://www.amazon.co.uk/War-conflict-civilisation-primates-robots/dp/184668417X

u/FaerilyRowanwind · 6 pointsr/Showerthoughts

This teacher was an archeologist specific to my state.
https://www.amazon.com/Apocalyptic-Grace-Evolution-Culture-Consciousness/dp/1462872190/ref=nodl_
He passed away a few years ago. But the book is a kinda interesting read.

u/TheFatCatSatOnATwat · 7 pointsr/AskUK

Are you going to be moving to London or elsewhere?

I'd also recommend this book to get a sense of how British people are (it says English, but the Scots and Welsh aren't that different, from a sociological perspective).

u/scatterstars · 1 pointr/Philippines

> the townsfolk kinda use the word witch with anybody who has knowledge of the oral folklore (which of course included spells as well as epics and stories) and herbal stuff (which was of course seen as partially magical decades ago)

PBMA is more oriented towards the herbal medicine part of that, from my experience. Again, I never met anyone who was claimed to be a witch, so knowledge of oral tradition never really entered into the picture. However, I'm interested in that kind of thing as an anthropology major and would love to have a chance to sit down and talk to a babaylan (not sure if you know that word but it's a Kinaray-a term for a sort of storyteller/healer/mystic type of person, similar to how you described your grandma).

"Gahum" means the same thing in Hiligaynon, so no need to attempt a translation on my behalf. I know it's translated as "power" by foreign missionaries and such, as in "ang gahum sang Balaan nga Espiritu" (I know because I was one of those missionaries a year and a half ago), but from what I understand it's supposed to refer to more intangible power than something actually tangible, making it more difficult to translate accurately.

As for "gaba", I haven't heard that one before but I'll have to take a look at another one of my various books and see if the author mentions it at all.

u/myelib · 1 pointr/slavelabour

/u/bioscaf is requesting following book, I have PDF. Anyone else also need it?? PM Me Here to buy.

Anthropology: What Does it Mean to Be Human? 4th Edition

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0190840684

u/Worsaae · 3 pointsr/AskAnthropology

When it comes to archaeological theory, Bruce Trigger is your man.

u/Echelon64 · 14 pointsr/videos

No, it's in sociology textbooks now. The one I looked at recently is called "Sociology: The Core" this one if you want to look at it.

u/litigant-in-person · 5 pointsr/LegalAdviceUK

No problem. Just to summarise -

  • Further Police involvement isn't going to be likely because it was anti-American rather than being anti-Semitic; as we now know, the former is not criminal, whereas the latter is.

  • It's also unlikely that you could sue the bus company (or driver) for financial compensation, because they have also not broken any civil law.

    But yeah, don't let this put you off making a fuss and complaining, they fucked up, you just won't realistically be able to threaten to sue them or have them arrested or anything. Reach out to those organisations I linked above, they may disagree, or they may be able to send e-mails supporting your complaint to the bus company or something.

    On an unrelated note, no idea how long you've been in the country, but I always suggest this book to any newcomer to the country, because there's loads of weird unwritten rules and stuff, so learning about them might help you integrate more and understand what the deal with queuing, pubs, bants, etc. is. It's absolutely worth the investment.