#8,024 in Health, fitness & dieting books
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of Vaccines Did Not Cause Rachel's Autism: My Journey as a Vaccine Scientist, Pediatrician, and Autism Dad

Sentiment score: 0
Reddit mentions: 2

We found 2 Reddit mentions of Vaccines Did Not Cause Rachel's Autism: My Journey as a Vaccine Scientist, Pediatrician, and Autism Dad. Here are the top ones.

Vaccines Did Not Cause Rachel's Autism: My Journey as a Vaccine Scientist, Pediatrician, and Autism Dad
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
Specs:
Height8.5 Inches
Length5.5 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateOctober 2018
Weight0.89948602896 Pounds
Width0.84 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 2 comments on Vaccines Did Not Cause Rachel's Autism: My Journey as a Vaccine Scientist, Pediatrician, and Autism Dad:

u/xNovaz · 1 pointr/VaxTalk

More confirmation bias because you cant accept that Suzanne Humpries is a credible source.

Your own logic used against you.

> How can we be sure Dr Humphries isn't simply making stuff up?

> Anti-vax zealots would do anything to promote a book.

How can we be sure Dr Offit isn't simply making stuff up?

Pro-vax zealots would do anything to promote a book.

https://www.amazon.com/Deadly-Choices-Anti-Vaccine-Movement-Threatens/dp/0465021492/ref=mp_s_a_1_4?crid=7QTCJX4VQV70&keywords=dr+paul+offit&qid=1555344001&s=gateway&sprefix=dr+paul+offit&sr=8-4

https://www.amazon.com/Paul-A.-Offit/e/B001ILIGP6

Your credible source Peter Hotez who went on the Joe Rogan show to promote censorship. Hint: look at the comments. Nobody buys the Bs.

Peter Hotez has no incentive to sell his book.

https://www.amazon.com/Vaccines-Did-Not-Cause-Rachels-Autism/dp/1421426609/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?keywords=peter+hotez&qid=1555344106&s=gateway&sr=8-1

He whines about it all the time on twitter lmao. https://mobile.twitter.com/PeterHotez?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

Watch this video later

> See how that works? I could just as easily be skeptical of Humphries claim, but I'm not.
And I'd appreciate keeping the discussion factual, or we'll soon be discussing 'lizard people poisoning our children' or some similar conspiracy bs.

What claim about Suzanne Humpries. I claim she is a reputable source that threatens pro-vaxxers to the core. I provided proof to explain why she dangerous: death threats and hate. Why is she dangerous?

I’m sure both sides suffer similar problems. Don’t all controversial issues. But we aren’t talking about lizard people poisoning our children. We are talking about vaccines that have known toxins in them. The argument is: the dose makes the poison.

I’m not dying on that hill. This is called a debate. 2 different sides. 2 different viewpoints. 1 objective stance.

See how that works?

u/Strangeteeth_ · 1 pointr/metacanada

Not really interested in doxxing myself but I can tell you from first hand experience, education, training, and work in the field of medicine, what you are saying is completely incorrect.

Children are exposed to hundreds of antigens everyday, exposing them to 26 different antigens over the course of 6 years is the equivalent to adding a drop of water to an Olympic sized swimming pool. Alternate vaccine schedules aren’t recommender by any health organization. anti-vaccine theories and “science” is one of the most widely debunked subjects in medicine, every single study has been debunked by per review. Flat earth, moon landing conspiracy theorists and anti-vaxxers all use the same tactics to justify the beliefs they hold. It’s pseudoscience

This is a list of resources from the scientific community, public health officials and immunologists. They all agree on this stuff, it isn’t questionable science.

https://www.publichealth.org/public-awareness/understanding-vaccines/vaccine-myths-debunked/

In particular I’d like to direct you to this quote
> Myth #5: Better hygiene and sanitation are actually responsible for decreased infections, not vaccines.
Vaccines don’t deserve all the credit for reducing or eliminating rates of infectious disease. Better sanitation, nutrition, and the development of antibiotics helped a lot too. But when these factors are isolated and rates of infectious disease are scrutinized, the role of vaccines cannot be denied. One example is measles in the United States. When the first measles vaccine was introduced in 1963, rates of infection had been holding steady at around 400,000 cases a year. And while hygienic habits and sanitation didn’t change much over the following decade, the rate of measles infections dropped precipitously following the introduction of the vaccine, with only around 25,000 cases by 1970. Another example is Hib disease. According to CDC data, the incidence rate for this malady plummeted from 20,000 in 1990 to around 1,500 in 1993, following the introduction of the vaccine.

WTO
https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/95/10/17-021017/en/

Health Canada
https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/vaccination-children.html

Book written by vaccine scientists and Pediatrician
https://www.amazon.com/Vaccines-Did-Not-Cause-Rachels-Autism/dp/1421426609

Joe Rogan interviews the books author Peter Hotez
https://youtu.be/dodsGp37M50

I could literally spend the day linking you study’s, reports and books that have all held up to the peer review process but it’s pointless because you won’t care, the information isn’t something you care about, you aren’t coming at this topic objectively.