#99 in Computer CPU processors

Reddit mentions of Intel Core i5-4430 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.0 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1150 - BX80646I54430

Sentiment score: 4
Reddit mentions: 12

We found 12 Reddit mentions of Intel Core i5-4430 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.0 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1150 - BX80646I54430. Here are the top ones.

Intel Core i5-4430 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.0 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1150 - BX80646I54430
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Energy-efficient performance for data-intensive business applications
  • Enable users to optimize and scale computing environments that maximize server utilization to workload
  • Workstation users can design, model, create, and visualize faster on innovation platforms powered by Intel Xeon processors
  • Energy-efficient performance for data-intensive business applications
  • Workstation users can design, model, create, and visualize faster on innovation platforms powered by Intel Xeon processors
Specs:
Height3.2 inches
Length4.5 inches
Number of items1
SizeCPU Only
Weight0.661386786 pounds
Width4 inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 12 comments on Intel Core i5-4430 Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.0 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1150 - BX80646I54430:

u/TheShadowBlade92 · 2 pointsr/pcmasterrace
u/TeaJizzle · 2 pointsr/Civcraft

Looks pretty good for a budget PC, I'd look at spending $30 more on a r9 270 since it's quite a bit better.

Swap out the PSU for a similar quality 500w one and you'll have plenty of power for no extra cost.


If there's any way you can stretch to a cheap i5 it'll be well worth it as more games start utilizing multicores. It's another $60 but if you can't do another $90 then I'd go for the graphics card upgrade instead.

u/Remo_253 · 1 pointr/techsupport

Helpful hint - when posting links you can format them as text and just the text shows, but as a live link. So "this processor (http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00CO8T9VC/ref=gno_cart_title_0?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=A1HVS4RF533X76[1] ) " becomes "this processor"

u/nikomans · 1 pointr/buildapc

That's interesting. I think I'm definitely going for the 970. Do you recommend getting a equal priced level intel chip instead of the A 10 7700k? I.e. will this one perform better?

u/zemkk · 1 pointr/buildapc

What case would you recommend that supports these parts then? This is pretty much all I plan on shoving into it.

Edit: Would this mobo and this cpu work just the same with everything else? It would save me quite a bit of money but in terms of quality, how far am I dropping? I think the $20 difference for the cpu isn't worth the drop, or am I wrong?

u/3G6A5W338E · 1 pointr/linux

Ok. I went and looked into it (current status of things):

Intel® Core™ i5-4430 Processor (4core, integrated GPU) $180 http://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-4430-Quad-Core-Desktop-Processor/dp/B00CO8T9VC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1407811265&sr=8-1&keywords=4430

vs

(the one you mentioned) AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition FX-8350 (8core, no GPU) $180 http://shop.amd.com/en-us/components/processors/94012351

(...)

http://cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=1780&cmp[]=1924


As expected, i5 is still faster on single thread performance (what matters in the real world) and AMD wins, but only by using the 8 cores (which isn't a typical scenario... unless you're compiling software, transcoding video or raytracing an animation).

Perceived speed on a normal desktop scenario (where the 8 thread are seldom profited from) will be better with the i5. It also has a considerable lower TDP, in good part because it runs at a considerably lower clock.

We can ignore the fact FX has no GPU If you were buying the FX to play games (and therefore getting a discrete GPU). But in that scenario, the 8cores will be wasted; modern games use 2, perhaps 3. Since you won't be using the 8 cores, the Intel's 4 cores would give you higher performance, because core per core they are faster. If you consider TDP on top of that (assume it even lower that stated for the i5 because you won't be using the builtin GPU), then Intel's a clear winner.

So, clearly, if you can afford entering i5 price range, then it's an i5. If not, perhaps there AMD has some wiggle-play?

I'm aware AMD rules the absolute lower end (with Socket AM1) in any event; the atoms are more expensive and aren't proportionally faster.

u/seifer666 · 1 pointr/Guelph

those parts are not actually worth that. a 2500k is not worth 300 dollars. I paid 250 about 3 years ago.

you can get a newer version of that processor for half the price
http://www.amazon.com/Intel-i5-4430-Quad-Core-Desktop-Processor/dp/B00CO8T9VC/?tag=logicaincrem-20