(Part 2) Reddit mentions: The best feminist theory books

Susan M. Shaw and Janet Lee, Women’s Voices, Feminist Visions: Classic and Contemporary Readings, 6th ed. McGraw-Hill, 2015
URL:::::
https://www.amazon.com/Womens-Voices-Feminist-Visions-Contemporary/dp/0078027004/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1517516447&sr=1-1&keywords=Susan+M.+Shaw+and+Janet+Lee%2C+Women%E2%80%99s+Voices%2C+Feminist+Visions%3A+Classic+and+Contemporary+Readings%2C+6th+ed.+McGraw-Hill%2C+2015

$5 Paypal

I don't think you really understand what feminism is? There are many types of feminism, and Tumblr is hardly representative of any particular kind. Read Judith Lorber's Gender Inequality: Feminist Theories and Politics if you want a relatively succinct analysis of different types of feminism.

Manifesta is where I began!

http://www.amazon.com/Manifesta-10th-Anniversary-Edition-Feminism/dp/0374532303

Compilations by Bust or bitch will be great too. Also, anything by Jessica Valenti of the website feministing.

Mix Phyllis and her niece Suzanne Venker - and the Woman's Place equiv IRL is The FLipside of Feminism - https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01E7L6GZ0/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1

​

Venker - according to Wiki - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzanne_Venker

​

According to RationalWiki- https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Suzanne_Venker

​

Venker's own site - https://www.suzannevenker.com/

​

Oh- and Venker on Fox - https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=suzanne+venker+fox

> http://www.amazon.com/Womens-Voices-Feminist-Visions-Contemporary/dp/0073512281

It is not a scholarly book. It is a popularist "introduction to gender studies" book which does not meet the requires for objective research.

Archived for your convenience

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, [megalodon.jp*](http://megalodon.jp/pc/get_simple/decide?url=https://www.amazon.com/What-Women-Want-Freedom-Feminism/dp/1925501477 "could not auto-archive; click to resubmit it!"), archive.is
   
   ^(I am a bot.) ^([Info](/r/SnapshillBot) ^/ ^[Contact](/message/compose?to=\/r\/SnapshillBot))

Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour (Critique Influence Change)

Women, Race, & Class

Wages Against
Housework

Como já te disseram, eu também não conheço muita gente que odeia os direitos mulheres, mas conheço muita gente que odeia o feminismo moderno, e são coisas infelizmente completamente diferentes. Recomendo a leitura deste livrinho Who Stole Feminism?, que explica como é que um movimento que inicialmente tinha boas intenções se destruiu a si mesmo. Mais recentemente, o documentários "The Red Pill" também explora o mesmo tema, mas de outra perspectiva.

Tanto online como offline toda a gente que procure sabe onde me situo nestas brincadeiras. Eu admito que ainda haja opressão contra as mulheres em vários campos, sobretudo socialmente, mas também existe contra o sexo masculino, não há exclusividades.

E a verdade é que não há ninguém a lutar pela igualdade. O movimento feminista diz que sim, que estão a lutar por todos, ainda estou para ver uma medida pela que lutem da qual não beneficiem diretamente. E essa conversa do "Sim, tu és homem/mulher/preto/branco, mas eu é que sei o que é melhor para ti" enjoa. E o movimento dos direitos dos homens é basicamente um movimento anti-feminista mas que não faz nada produtivo tirando ser do contra.

Em relação ao pessoal LGBT, para mim é para o lado que durmo melhor. Não me afectam minimamente, façam o que entenderem. Vivam e deixem viver, não me cabe a mim dizer-lhes como viver a vida deles.

Isto é um assunto extremamente tóxico, nota-se pelo teu comentário, e isso para mim representa a carga tóxica que existe dos extremos. Faz falta um terceiro movimento, mais hippie, realmente igualitário e que saiba lutar por si sem estar sempre a insultar este e aquele. Um movimento que não catalogue as pessoas por raça ou gênero ou ideologia mas que parta de um respeito básico dado a todo o ser humano.

Estou feliz que finalmente a comunidade "SJW" e a "anti-SJW" começam a abrir as portas ao diálogo. São as duas igualmente más.

EDIT: Downvotes sem argumentos só provam tudo o que disse. Demonstram incapacidade em ter discussões lógicas.

Estou lendo Feminism: The Ugly Truth - Mike Buchanan, o próximo da lista é o guia do mochileiro das galáxias, que sempre ouço falar mas nunca li. Estou criando o hábito de ler, faz uns 5 meses que comecei e já li 8 livros, quero ler uns 20 esse ano.

Define objective. I suspect that anyone reading an overly negative or overly positive conclusion will likely be dismissed by their critics as partisan.

I personally like the book Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women's Studies - which tries in part to look at job postings, class syllabi, department websites, etc. so even if you don't like their analysis that might be another way to explore the topic. (Beware, of course, of the potential for weaponized words).

necklace

bitch tits mug

everyday sexism book

fabulous and feminist tee

>While the one-child policy is awful, I think it's important to note that until the preference for sons is addressed, sex-selective abortion will still exist

True! Though I speculate (hopefully) that there will be less pressure to abort without the overall pressure to have fewer children.

Re: the link, CNN has a pretty consistent pro-population control lean, so I'd be wary of their reporting on this subject generally.

That said, even this article isn't particularly positive: if the only reason the "missing girls" aren't missing is because people ignored or dodged the law means that the law - and society - are still very broken. I'm not comfortable with the suggestion that "Everything is OK because the girls are secretly still alive", which is the sense I get from the article.

The book mentioned in the article in the OP (The Abolition of Woman: How Radical Feminism Is Betraying Women) goes into this in more detail.

Just did a quick search for "Fifty shades of..." on Amazon and found these:

• Fifty Sheds of Grey EDIT: Did notice that it actually said "a parody" (very subtle) on the cover
  
• Fifty Shades of Red, white and Blue
  
• Fifty Shades of Naughty
  
• Fifty Shades of Kale
  
• Fifty Shades of Bacon
  
• Fifty Shades of Feminism
  
• Fifty Shades of Nagging
  
• Fifty Shades of Paul Day
  
  All with a similar tonality to their cover, and all fail to mention that they're a parody or similar.
  
  EDIT: All this on the first four pages (of 20)

The statistics of the original 1:4 or the review about the statistics?

This is one I came across recently but as far back as the 90's the 1:4 have known to be well.. bullshit. I don't think there is a more appropriate terminology to describe it. This is a good example of early alarm bells by sain feminism. Second hand from the low low price of $0.01 apparantly. You have to wonder why 20 years later a large proportion of feminism are still presenting these numbers as fact. I personally believe this is where a lot of false allegations stem from.

"date rape apologist"

You can read the first pages of her 1994 book on Amazon
https://www.amazon.com/Morning-After-Sex-Fear-Feminism/dp/0316754323

Vandana Shiva has discussed at length the impacts of Monsanto on her native country.

Check out her words in Feminist Politics Activism and Vision for the full article, sources included.

The problem, in essence, is that Monsanto has claimed to have property rights on seeds, which forces farmers to use expensive terminator seeds that must be purchased annually.

This displaces the farming done primarily by women into the hands of large corporate farms, forcing women who have relied on farming for generations further into poverty.

>She wasn't making up her assault [because] She has a blog and has been involved in activism pertaining to SlutWalk longer than the rest of the group has been.

Sorry, the reason you gave is unrelated to your premise. The fact that she has a blog and been involved in activism is irrelevant to whether she made up the assault or not—it may even make it more likely she is making it up, in order to fit into the feminist group. One instance of that was described in Katie Roiphe's book: http://www.amazon.ca/Morning-After-Sex-Fear-Feminism/dp/0316754323

Civil Rights in the 60's were bad for black people m'kay?

Feminism: A one stop train to becoming a prostitute and hating families!

Because people killing each other in the Middle East is a GOOD thing.

Only rich white people can write good things.

BRITISH EMPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIRE fapfapfapfapfap

The USFG caused the Great depression. More specifically FDR.

Oh right, and capitalism had NOTHING to do with the Depression. At all.

The South WASN'T actually racist. Nope, they had Jesus on their side too. Also, you gave up your vacations in Cuba, you Yankee bastards.

Conservatives are the only real Americans! Everyone else is a dirty communist spy!

If you question the Bible, you question liberty and tolerance and reason.

Roman history is EXACTLY the same as US history. Also, the Middle Ages were the Age of Reason.

The Founding Fathers were conservatives. And totally supported the South in the Civil War, even though they were dead.

Evolution never happened!

And, of course... The US should be a Christian theocracy with slaves.