#1,892 in Home furniture
Reddit mentions of Winsome 94084 Satori Stool, 24", Walnut
Sentiment score: 1
Reddit mentions: 5
We found 5 Reddit mentions of Winsome 94084 Satori Stool, 24", Walnut. Here are the top ones.
or
- One saddle seat stool offers an economical yet stylish seating option;Features: Backless
- Crafted of solid beechwood with choice of matte black or walnut finishes
- Wide, contoured top and sturdy square legs;Transitional style
- Assembly required; tools and hardware included. The color you see may not exactly match the product color, and may depend, in part, upon the monitor you are using
- Available in 24-inch and 29-inch heights.Dimensions (W x D x H):17.48 x 14.47 x 24 inches
Features:
Specs:
| Color | Walnut |
| Height | 24 Inches |
| Length | 14.47 Inches |
| Number of items | 1 |
| Release date | October 2001 |
| Size | 24" |
| Weight | 11 Pounds |
| Width | 17.48 Inches |
Here's your Halloween costume:
https://www.amazon.com/Winsome-Saddle-24-Inch-Counter-Walnut/dp/B001E95R3G/
https://www.amazon.com/Koch-5011635-Twisted-Polypropylene-Brown/dp/B002T44UGA/
Bar
Stools
That particular stool is called a saddle stool. Just google them and you'll find plenty of versions. The table legs and stools all look to be painted.
https://www.amazon.com/Winsome-94084-Satori-Stool-Walnut/dp/B001E95R3G/ref=mp_s_a_1_3?keywords=stool&qid=1550731977&s=gateway&sr=8-3
Oh my god you're a fucking moron. Did you even read my comment? If you are discussing theory and this is your reply to my comment, you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the theory. The other explanation is you read something incorrectly, which wouldn't be such a problem but then you adopt such a cunt tone in your reply.
In theory
>Anything that can be done with a regex can be done with a finite automaton, and vice versa
Where did I state that recognising an email is impossible with finite automata? If something can be recognised by a finite automaton, it can be done with a regex.
Your original comment said that you cannot do this with regex but can with finite automata, but in theory
>They are equivalent in their expressive power, they both recognise the set of regular languages.
Anybody who has a semblance of an idea of what they're talking about will agree that they are in theory equivalent. So you can do it with regex, in theory.
Your article that you linked but didn't read carefully, states this same fact.
>And can you fully implement the complex grammars in the RFCs in your regex parser in a readable way?
It talks about the practical issues, e.g. being able to do it in a readable way with regex, because in fucking theory they are equivalent in their expressive power.
You may find the below useful:
https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Theory-Computation-Michael-Sipser/dp/113318779X
Alternatively:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DKA3S6A/ref=s9_acsd_top_hd_bw_b292I_c_x_5_w?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-3&pf_rd_r=DQJA7YYF6XRPQ9DCCW1S&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=b949820f-ff03-5be8-b745-f0a5e56b98c9&pf_rd_i=511394
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001E95R3G/ref=s9_acsd_top_hd_bw_bFfLP_c_x_1_w?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=merchandised-search-4&pf_rd_r=MXQ2SVBM01QEAAET2X18&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=c842552a-f9c9-5abd-8c7d-f1340c84cb6d&pf_rd_i=3733851