#4 in Spotting scopes
Use arrows to jump to the previous/next product

Reddit mentions of BARSKA 15-40x50 Colorado Spotting Scope

Sentiment score: 2
Reddit mentions: 5

We found 5 Reddit mentions of BARSKA 15-40x50 Colorado Spotting Scope. Here are the top ones.

BARSKA 15-40x50 Colorado Spotting Scope
Buying options
View on Amazon.com
or
    Features:
  • Fully coated optics with porro prism system
  • Large 50mm objective lens
  • Shock absorbing rubber armor
  • Come with table tripod and soft carrying case
  • The highest clarity range is at 150 yards. Beyond 150 yards, the image will naturally start to become blurry.
Specs:
ColorBlack
Height0.0393700787 Inches
Length0.0393700787 Inches
Number of items1
Release dateApril 2011
Weight0.881849048 Pounds
Width0.0393700787 Inches

idea-bulb Interested in what Redditors like? Check out our Shuffle feature

Shuffle: random products popular on Reddit

Found 5 comments on BARSKA 15-40x50 Colorado Spotting Scope:

u/rekstout · 2 pointsr/guns

If I'm only shooting between 25 and 100 yards - is this dubiously cheap spotting scope going to be sufficient to check my groups?

http://www.amazon.com/BARSKA-15-40x50-Colorado-Spotting-Scope/dp/B0049IZMUW

u/drbudro · 1 pointr/longrange

I bought this scope and put this tripod on it. It works great out to 100yds with .22lr/.223. Cheaper glass will get fuzzy at higher magnifications, so I find that 30x works best for this particular scope.

u/Lost_Thought · 1 pointr/guns

Here, Here and Here, though i would pick a $10 binocular over a $30 spotting scope. (based on experience with both)


u/schorhr · 1 pointr/telescopes

Hello :-)

Yes, a reflector is the best bang for the buck but the image is upside-down. You can get erecting eyepieces and erecting adapters, but as they are rarely used (it does not matter if space is "upside-down") there are few choices and especially the adapters tend to be of poor quality.

Under $200 you will have MANY sets that are not good; Either on a weak tripod or with flawed optics. Short cheap refractors are not suited for high magnification; Short newtonian reflectors have their flaws, too.

.

GoScope: Short refractor has several flaws, despite the large aperture.

Starblast 4.5": Short reflector, the aperture ratio of F/4 will have several flaws.

70eq: Small refractor. Not bad, but it just lacks the aperture for many targets. Especially for terrestrial, the 70az would be better (and cheaper) than the 70EQ

.

Yes, aperture is key, but portability plays a big role, too :-)

Here is a link on what to expect in different smaller apertures and one link with more comparisons:

  • http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.binoviewer.at%2Fbeobachtungspraxis%2Fteleskopvergleich_deepsky.htm&sandbox=1

  • https://www.reddit.com/r/Astronomy/comments/3j2wjo/what_is_a_good_telescope_in_this_budget/cum0622

    .

    For size, see


  • http://www.astropetes.com.au/telescopes.html

  • AWB/Heritage http://www.zudensternen.de/Teleskop%20Skywatcher%20Heritage%20Dobson%20130.html


    .


    One option under $200 is the Celestron c90; You will need a (rigid) tripod and one or two more eyepieces, but these are fun for terrestrial viewing and super small. Maksutovs are short as they have a different design (optical path "bouncing" back and forth).

    For $200, you can get a 5" telescope though, or a 6" dobsonian for $275 if the main focus is space... And get some $35 binoculars or spotting scope for day-time (Celestron Cometron 7x50, or just something simple as this spotting scope so you don't have to compromise regarding night-time observing!)

    Here a few other suggestions;

  • AWB Onesky - Great telescope for kids, but more than a toy. Low to the ground but far more rigid than all the weak sets on tripod in this price range; It has a few quirks, but nothing you can't fix.

  • 90mm refractor will show more than the typical 60, 70mm refractors in this price range; The tripod like in all of the cheaper sets aren't very rigid.

  • c90, as discussed, sometimes cheaper; The down-side is mainly the small maximum field of view and a bit less contrast compared to the refractor, the up-side is the ultra compact size.


  • If you insist on small size and day-time use, you can also get the c90 on a computerized table top mount for $225. GoTo does not make everything necessarily easier (you will still need to know about the night-sky, and "Turn left at Orion" or "Simple stargazing" is an easier read than the Computer control's manual), but for the price difference, you could go that way.


  • 6" Dobsonian - best bang for the buck (Except for the 8" which already shows the spiral structure of a bunch of galaxies...)

    .


    Eyepieces: It depends strongly on the choice of telescope. But you can get decent eyepieces for $20-$40, and there's no need to combine a cheap kit eyepiece with a cheap barlow. Stay away from overpriced eypiece box sets and zoom eyepieces (as they have a narrow apparent field of view on one side of the scale, but they can be nice for a day-time spotting scope). Two or three decent wide-angle eyepieces instead can go a long way.