(Part 2) Reddit mentions: The best health & body reference books

There are a few that are primarily based around the history of the Frisbee itself like 'flat flip flies straight' , which if you really like the history of it is pretty interesting, and a few others like 'the complete book of Frisbee..' which I have not read .

More specific to disc golf is The Definitive Guide... .

edit: here is a great little short write up I keep bookmarked.

I suggest reading this book by Elizabeth Stewart, MD. It can help narrow down or at least clarify some of the pain issues you describe and has some great resources for locating a doctor who specializes in your condition. There are so many issues that can affect pelvic health (I've been diagnosed and treated for way too many of them, lol). This book finally set me on the right path to recovery. So there is hope! Do it for yourself, and your partner will be the lucky recipient of your efforts.

Yes, it is really that great. Also get the Training for the New Alpinism Training Log.

Evolutionary Medicine Evolutionary Medicine and Health: New Perspectives

The book assumes a basic knowledge, but it is a great collection of articles on multiple topics.

This subject is covered in great lengths in this book. The book also talks about all the innovative green technology which could have reshaped the way we live our lives today that got pushed aside because of lack of funding, or political reasons.

https://www.amazon.ca/Spin-Doctors-Chiropractic-Industry-Examination/dp/155002406X
This was written by investigative reporters, and is well supported with sources.

Second for MMRS. It has some of the whackiest mnemonics, but ill be damned if they don't help. Each chapter has a table that nicely summarizes everything about each pathogen with all the high-yield things to know. We had to learn it cover to cover in about 2 weeks so I really know just how useful this book is.

As for immuno, we were assigned this book for our class. I thought it was extremely helpful in explaining everything as if the author knew what a student would find confusing or unclear. It is certainly not a quick review book so I wouldn't recommend this for actual board studying.

I don't know if this is what you are looking for or more of something like this...?

Yes, check out Psychiatrist Lee Sannella's book 'The Kundalini Experience'...

The Kundalini Experience (Amazon Link)

Are you talking about staff training? I’m a big fan of Bob Mager’s Six Pack and Tom Gilbert’s Human Competence. I come from a more behavioral side of ID, though... which is something I rarely see represented on here.

https://www.amazon.com/New-Mager-Six-Pack-Robert-F/dp/187961815X

https://www.amazon.com/Human-Competence-Engineering-Worthy-Performance/dp/0787996157/ref=mp_s_a_1_fkmr1_1?keywords=tom+gilbert+human+competence&qid=1562848027&s=gateway&sr=8-1-fkmr1

Makes a lot of sense to me. There was/is a method of fixing jet lag that uses the same principles -- "Overcoming Jet Lag" I think it was called, but I believe it was reprinted as "The Cure for Jet Lag".

There's a decent amount out there as well if you google "Argonne Jet Lag" or "Fasting Jet Lag".

Different strokes for different folks for sure.

Don't know if this (and the feminine equivalent) are what you're after...

http://www.amazon.com/The-Pill-Book-Harold-Silverman/dp/0553579746

Find one of these.

There is a book called, "the Pill Book". You should have a physical copy.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Pill-Book-Harold-Silverman/dp/0553579746 You can find them at thrift stores often. It provides information about identification and use. (It is what cops carry with them to identify pills they find).

If you use the book to to identify the fish-mox or fish-pen, etc. you'll realize it is exactly the same pill as for humans.

Amazon has it for $11.66.

https://www.amazon.com/Definitive-Guide-Disc-Golf/dp/1629372048

THE disc golf book

That book.

Great book.

http://www.amazon.com/Under-Radar-Pass-Drug-Marijuana-ebook/dp/B009K6Q356

That's the book I used. I followed it exactly and passed within three days after smoking literally everyday for years.

Sugar Blues

There is also an 2002 edition

Not sure if related, a documentary of same name 2016

It Was Probably Something You Ate: A Practical Guide to Avoiding and Surviving Food-borne Illness?

qeeg compares your brain to other brains in a similar state, ie sitting quietly, to determine a kind of base line snap shot. Most competent practitioners would ask you to do it early in the day and postpone taking the vyvanse till after the map, in order to get a good comparison (they wouldn't ask that of all meds, but it's typical to ask it for ADHD meds).

There's a book by Rob Longo for lay people with exactly these kind of questions https://www.amazon.com/Consumer%C2%92s-Understanding-Mapping-Neurofeedback-Training/dp/1532047312 (hopefully I linked right and that takes you to "A Consumer's Guide to qeeg Neurofeedback")

I think you really need to go talk to a gynecologist. In particular, the "deep inside" pain you are describing does not sound like vaginismus. You can also check out this book: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B001NJUPFW/

>Name me a moral concept. Or a few. And why are we assuming that nature is non-moral?

That's the thing, I'm saying that there are no distinctively "moral" properties in nature. Morality, defined as "The extent to which an action is right or wrong," is a useful fiction, based on the conventions and designs of other human beings. When someone says that "rape is morally wrong," what they are saying in effect is that its consequences are undesirable, and should be prohibited as a matter of principle. Once enough people come together and reach a consensus on this point, a new moral is born. But the moral itself does not derive its authority from an objective ground of value, which stands above and beyond the practical interests and agreements of human beings.

I'm far more comfortable with using the terms good or evil, just or unjust, equal or unequal, appropriate or inappropriate, suitable or unsuitable, proportional or disproportional, adaptive or maladaptive, functional or dysfunctional, efficient or inefficient. Note that I'm not talking about good or evil in a theistic or moral sense, I'm speaking in purely functional terms. A "good" thing of a certain kind is one which performs its function well. For instance, the function of a knife is to cut: cutting is that which a knife alone achieves, or achieves better than other objects. It is a distinctive quality of a knife that it cut well or badly. To the extent that an object lacks these traits, it will be evil or bad as a result. In that sense, the words that I use are devoid of subjective valuations, there is no expression of liking or prejudice, rather, I'm using these words to point to objective criteria, and as a result the claims are matters for empirical investigation, not what one or another ideology proclaims is right or wrong.

>Humans feel pain and process emotions in the same way that most mammals do.

I never denied that fact. However, I'd characterize the issue differently. As I said before, it is in the consitution of our species that we eat animal flesh for subsistance. Obviously, I'm not claiming that we require a wholly carniverous diet, only that a large proportion of our food comes from animals. The only implication that follows from this is that nature prescribes that lower animals are the proper prey of human beings, and thus it is fitting, appropriate, or suitable to our species. You are the one introducing a moral claim into this situation. And as I said, your claim is groundless as it appeals to an arbitrary preference of subjective taste. It has no moral authority. You also lack the general consent of others, which would be required to turn this into a principle or norm of conduct. So where does that leave us? I maintain that we have a natural right or entitlement to prey on other creatures for the good of our species. This right follows from the fact that we are proportionally superior, in nearly all respects, as it pertains to fitness, which is the only measure of comparison at issue in the final analysis. If you dispute this claim, kindly explain how it is possible for us to fish out entire oceans, or reduce whole ecosystems to cinders to suit our purposes. The suffering of other animals is indeed an evil, but only for those species so unfortunate to become victims of the human appetite.

Here's a small taste of the contradictory evidence you requested.

• Eaton. B. The ancestral human diet: what was it and should it be a paradigm for contemporary nutrition?
  
  
• Milton. K. A hypothesis to explain the role of meat-eating in human evolution
  
  
• Richards. M. A brief review of the archaeological evidence for paleolithic and neolithic subsistence
  
  
• A functional and structural comparison of man's digestive tract with that of a dog and sheep
  
  
• Fox. M. Cancer cells slurp up fructose, us study finds
  
  
• Heany. A. Fructose induces transketolase flux to promote pancreatic cancer growth
  
  
• Gluckman. P. Principles of evolutionary medicine
  
  
• Travathan. W. Evolutionary medicine
  
  
• Travathan. W. Evolutionary medicine and health: new perspectives
  
  
• Stearns. S, Evolution in health and disease
  
  
• Lindeberg. S. Food and western disease: health and nutrition from an evolutionary perspective
  
  
• Nesse. R. Why we get sick: the new science of Darwinian medicine
  
  
• Boaz. N. Evolving health: the origins of illness and how the modern world is making us sick
  
  
• Cordain. L. The paradoxical nature of hunter-gatherer diets: meat-based, yet non-atherogenic
  
  
• Cordain. L. The paleo diet
  
  
• Wolf. R. The paleolithic solution: the original human diet