Reddit mentions: The best digital point & shoot cameras

First post here, I've basicly spent the last couple of days researching/buying gear around your price point. I already possessed a Zoom H1, but since you can use your phone for that purpose, I'd say we're about in the same boat.

I'd personally recommend you to check out four primary options. If the newest model is too pricey, it might be worthwhile to check out the older versions.

1. Panasonic FZ300: Great Zoom, 4k video at the lowest possible price point afaik, great usability, decent stabilization, external mic input, flipable screen in all directions, decent built in mic, DSLR.
   Downside: Bulky.
   Honestly, I'm confident that this is probably the best camera out there for video right now, at least at its price point. However, if portability is a must, this one simply doesn't cut it.
   
2. Panasonic G7: Similar deal to the FZ300. I didn't find too many differences overall though. 4K, external mic, decent stabilization etc. Less zoom capabilities though. Also, it is more compact than the FZ300. It's a mirrorless camera, but it's also a bit more pricey than the FZ300. If size is a factor, this is a better choice. Also stills will be better with this one.
   
3. Sony RX100 ii: Great camera which does everything you wouldn't expect from this size. Very good image and video quality for its price point and unbeatable portability. However, no interchangeable lenses and due to its size, lacking duration on video due to overheating hazards. If you're looking to shoot for extended periods, the larger the better and panasonic is definitely your go-to. However if you prefer ease of use and a compact feel. This is the way to go.
   
4. Sony A5100: My personal choice at the end of the day. It's a very similar story to the RX100ii, but as opposed to the RX, this one has all the latest from sony. Massive sensor which means great low light performance and overall very high quality footage. New XAVC S codec for higher quality video. Both of these at a reasonable price point while enabling the use of interchangable lenses. Also, I just think this baby is way more charming than the RX series. However, it's definitely known to overheat over longer duration video shooting, it has no external mic input, no in built stabilization, no EVF and no shoe to mount stuff on. I didn't find these to be capable of weighing up to its potential though, especially with a pancake lens. I've got great portability, one of the best low light and video cameras at the price point. I actually figured out that I can bypass all of the problems it faces by buying myself an external recording device. Sure, this costs as much as the camera itself, but the benefits the camera offers are unbeatable at the price point, and if I enjoy myself enough up to a point where I want to invest more, I can just remove all the negatives and stay at the top in terms of quality AND portability, since the external recorder is equally portable.
   
   I haven't gone over the full details for all of them, but if any of them interest you in particular, just find some reviews and you'll get a good idea of what they're all about. Also, some are a bit over your budget, but I don't know how tight your finances are so I figured I'd just give you my take.
   
   Lastly, definitely don't forget audio as mentioned in the thread already. A lav mic will get your far since you can use it with the panasonics or your phone.
   
   Hope this has been more than just a rant. Good luck!
   

no, an iphone can not do this.
There is obviously some background defocus (also called shallow depth of field or "bokeh") and some editing going on (lifted shadows to give it a faded look, also some color correction done). The app VSCO can give you these kinds of effects for free, but you can pretty much do this with any free and easy to use image editor on any device.

You should probably get a small mirrorless camera that is easy to use.

Depending on how much you want to spend and how serious you are about photography, here are some choices.

Fixed Lens Cameras (no interchangeable lenses):

• Sony RX100 (no matter what Generation, they all have similar image quality, they are small and easy to use, Zoom Lens gives you some flexibility and decent bachground defocus)
  
  
• Canon G1 X (dont know too much about this one)
  
  
• Panasonic LX100 (more expensive and new, but has a great zoom lens and a big sensor, should result in shallower depth of field than the two previous cameras)
  
  
• Fuji X100S (even more expensive and no zoom, but amazing image quality and even bigger sensor, should give you even more background defocus)
  
  
  Now some interchangeable lens cameras:
  
  
• Sony Alpha 5000 (very cheap and small, but big sensor and decent kit lens, no Viewfinder though, only the display)
  
  
• Panasonic GM1 (even smaller than the Sony, but also a slighy smaller sensor, again: no viewfinder)
  
  
• Olympus E-PL7 (same lenses as the Panasonic!)
  
  
• Sony Alpha 5100 or 6000 (both a bit better than the 5000, but also quite a bit more expensive, the 6000 has a viewfinder and is considered to be a really great camera, even for more professional shooters. In any way, it would be a good idea to get at least one additional lens, something like the Sony SEL50F18, a 50mm F1.8 lens that gives you fantastic portrait images and beautiful background defocus.)
  
  
  
  As you can tell: there are a lot of choices.
  
  If you are new to photography and not interested in buying lenses, go with a fixed lens camera like the RX100. You can get the first or second gen version for less than 400$ and its very compact! It should give you similar photos, especially if you zoom all the way in (results in more background defocus, its used to separate the background and the subject).
  
  Here is a link to amazon:
  http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00DM8R866/ref=olp_tab_all
  
  and here are some nice sample images of the RX100:
  https://www.flickr.com/search/?sort=interestingness-desc&text=rx100%20portrait
  
  
  hope this helps!
  
  
  
  

Bags

• (1) [Filson Medium Field Bag](http://www.filson.com/products/field-bag-medium.70232.html?fromCat=true&fvalsProduct=luggage/field-bags&fmetaProduct=1019): This is my usual every day bag, and I rarely leave the house without it. After a long search for a bag last year, I decided to buy the Filson (and get it shipped from the US); I'm glad I did – the quality is fantastic, and it looks practically the same as it did on its first day.
  
  -or-
  
  
• (2) [Filson Briefcase Computer Bag](http://www.filson.com/products/briefcase-computer-bag.70257.html?fromCat=true&fvalsProduct=luggage/briefcases&fmetaProduct=1019): If I ever take my MacBook Air with me outside of the house (usually to some work at a coffee shop), or if I go on a flight, I'll take this bag. It's rarely used in comparison to the Field Bag, but it's worth a mention nonetheless.
  
  Gadgetry
  
  
• (3) [iPad (third generation) - Wi-Fi and 4G](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00746V5DY/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00746V5DY) with (4) [Byrd & Belle felt pouch](http://www.byrdandbelle.com/product/ipad-kindle-sleeve-gray-wool-felt-and-brown-leather), and (5) red leather Smart Cover: The iPad has been an integral part of my EDC since the original iPad. I seem to be getting more and more done on the iPad – whether it's emailing, writing with Byword or reading news with Reeder.
  
• (6) [iPhone 4](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0041E5G32/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B0041E5G32) with (7) [Sena Tan Leather pouch](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003X9ZJSS/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B003X9ZJSS)
  
• (8) [13" MacBook Air](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005CWHZP4/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B005CWHZP4) with (9) [Byrd & Belle felt pouch](http://www.byrdandbelle.com/product/macbook-air-sleeve-gray-wool-felt-and-brown-leather)
  
• (10) [Fujifilm X100](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0043RS864/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B0043RS864) with [Leather Case](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004MME698/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B004MME698): I used to own a Canon 7D, but its size is so unwieldy for me in practice, that it ended up not being used. Instead, I've swapped it for the X100 – sure the lens is fixed, but I mainly used a prime lens with the 7D anyway; the APS-C sensor is a boon, especially for the camera's small size. The software is a little finicky, but the cassis and build quality is fantastic.
  
• (11) [Etymotic HF3 Earphones with Mic with pouch](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003YTROIU/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B003YTROIU)
  
• (12)[ B&W P5 Headphones](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003IHUHGE/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B003IHUHGE): If I have the rare inclination to listen to music (I usually listen to podcasts) and am happy to take the additional hassle compared to the HF3s, I'll sometimes use the P5s. The design and construction is amazing and the audio quality is great, although the leather pads do get a little hot after a while on my ears.
  
• (13) [Amazon Kindle 4](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0051QVESA/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B0051QVESA): Reeder and Instapaper are great on the iPad, but the Kindle is much better for novel reading. The iPad 3's new screen is on par (if not better) than e-ink, but the Kindle's much smaller size and weight is a necessity for prolonged periods of reading.
  
  Accessories and Miscellaneous
  
  
• (14) [Cocoon GRIT-IT! Organiser](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002HU27UW/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B002HU27UW): This incorporates, (15) [Studio Neat Cosmonaut Stylus](http://www.studioneat.com/products/cosmonaut); (16) Barclays PinSentry card reader; *(17) Zebra F-701***; **(18) iPad SD Card Reader; (19) [Griffin USB Mini-Cable Kit](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003T5KXJQ/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B003T5KXJQ); (20) [USB Battery Pack](http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000UH46YY/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=coffee-coffee-21&linkCode=as2&camp=1634&creative=19450&creativeASIN=B000UH46YY)
  
• (21) Polo Ralph Lauren Leather Card Holder
  
• (22)[ Seiko SNK809 Automatic watch](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002SSUQFG/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B002SSUQFG) with [Hirsch Liberty leather strap](http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B002ZJIVNW/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=lawrencemurga-21&linkCode=as2&camp=1634&creative=19450&creativeASIN=B002ZJIVNW)
  
• (23) Keys including [True Utility Cashstash](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002JUDJBG/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B002JUDJBG), [LaCie 8GB Key](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004D2AZ0Q/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=yoarthwo0e-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B004D2AZ0Q) and Barclays Cycle Hire key
  
• (24) Hand Sanitiser
  
• (25) Passport
  
• (26) Screen Cleaning Cloth

Honestly. I have been where you are right now.

If you want to take this as seriously as possible and become a producer, the thing you need to invest in most is audio.

Cameras will come and go, but a great mic and recorder will go a long way to making your work so much better. I still use my t3i's in productions with my GH4. The t3i is an amazing little camera and you have the nifty figty which is the only lens I shot on for years.

If you want to get a really nice camera that will be a great investment I would suggest a combo of camera + a Tascam recorder.

I have this recorder and LOVE it.

and this Camera would be a great combo for you with the Tascam 70d.

I have the GH4 and it's amazing and the panasonic fz1000 is crazy good with an amazing lens.

Good luck!

edit: Okay, I've thought about the lens thing. Can you tell me what the price range, portability, and learning curve on that stuff? I'm a very quick learner when it comes to gadgets (I rooted my phone the 3rd day I had it, I do tech support etc). The "travel" video you linked is basically exactly what I want to do, but I also will need audio.

Edit2: Oh...I just reread it (I'm half asleep)...So the thing is, this is going to be a big hiking trip, and I'm not so sure I want to be lugging that bad boy around :/ It's kinda huge. If I have to stop and keep taking it out of the bag every time I want a shot, or I can't climb trees or something wild it's gonna put a huge damper on things. I'm a big climber and although I don't think a GoPro is appropriate due to limitations in zoom etc, I'm not certain that big thing would work.

Edit3: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B008MB719C/switctrave-20 I found this after reading this
http://www.switchbacktravel.com/best-cameras-hiking-backpacking I know I want to be a bit ...not reckless..but..I want to be able to bounce from rock to rock with grace and not risk falling into the water as a result of camera weight. Like if I see something interesting, I dont wanna get out a 4 LBS (how much does your camera weigh?) and be like "oh lemme just jog to get this shot" :P So that's why I was looking into active cams etc, but I also want good quality so :/

Edit4: I'm pretty interested in something with compact size, even if that means sacrificing a bit of quality. I need to be able to move this thing from point A to point B, even if point B is high up in a tree.

>the 18-55mm zoom lens is purely manual - the camera lacks a power zoom

hmm...
____

Holy heck! This is a lot to take in. I'm starting from almost total scratch knowledge here, so I'll have to give some look at what some of this means :P

As much as I'd like to stretch my budget, I'm not sure it's worth it..even if I could. A few questions before I've really understood and digested most of this.

• Is the difference between specs like a phone? Like to me the difference between say the iPhone 4 and the Samsung Galaxy s5 are big enough...just because it's android. But like the Galaxy s3 to s5? Or Motorola at half the price point? To me they're just phones :/ I wouldn't use half the features anyway.... Are cameras like this? I don't necessarily need the really high-end specs right now. I'd love to have them, but $400 is STEEEEP.
  
  
• Baring in mind I have next to no professional video editing experience (only stuff like power point, windows movie maker [a joke], and audacity audio stuff) do you still think the difference in nuance is worth it?
  
  
• What are the pros and cons of near doubling my budget?
  
  
• Do you think it's better to wait until I have the skills of editing and filming to get a better camera? Start small and go big next time? or is this something I should just jump right into.
  
  
• In a few years, do you think the prices of this stuff will drop considerably? Will 4k be the new standard?
  
  As much as I'd like to get a REALLY nice camera, I really am broke :/
  
  Thanks so much for this brilliant response! This is why I didn't just listen to the goons on the other sub and kept looking :D

Do you have a lot out experience with cameras? If not jumping straight into a DSLR may be a bit overwhelming.

Also, as the dad of a 1.5 year old, I can say that such a large camera is not always practical, nor is the sound of the shutter. Beside setup shots, you're not going to easily be able to hold the camera for a quick "selfie" of your baby sleeping on you. it's a specific example, but a lot of situations will come up where such a large/somewhat loud device will hinder you.


Consider down the road, after the first 3-6 months of house arrest, you'll want something light and small that you can carry around top of all the other baby gear, and that your kid isn't going to immediately want to play with instead of having their picture taken. I probably would have missed some of my best shots if I didn't have such a small camera that is unobtrusive and easy to carry for sort walks to the park or other situations where I would be discouraged in bringing a big SLR.

I wanted to get a DSLR to replace my s/o's point and shoot a few months back but I decided to wait on the investment and bought a Panasonic Lumix LX7. I couldn't be happier.

The lens is amazing, having a very wife aperture which allows for great indoor low-light photos--the main reason i wanted a new camera. Not every photo has an instant amazing pop of modern DSLRs, but if I stop and think about the shot the results are outstanding for a $300 camera


I mostly use aperture priority, turn the aperture ring appropriately for the scene, and go to town, but the auto mode is smart enough to be able to hand to anyone. The movie button will begin recording with your current settings so you don't have to switch the dial to movie mode. It will shoot raw+jpeg so you can share the photo instantly while having an archive quality version. And if youre willing to learn to do some post processing when you have time (in a couple years maybe? Harhar), 60 seconds of adjusting in Lightroom will really bring out the quality of the camera and make for great prints. You'll also be able to save photos that you thought were incorrectly exposed or have too much contrast.

In the end the best camera is the one you'll actually have with you all the time. And when you eventually decide to step up to the SLR, the technology will have greatly increased for your price range and you'll still have a great backup.

I have to go to work and would love to badly type more on my phone, but if you have questions about my experience lemme know.

Here's some reviews:

http://blog.mingthein.com/2013/03/25/leica-d-lux-6-panasonic-lx7/

http://blog.entropicremnants.com/2013/03/08/virtue-in-downsizing--panasonic-lumix-dmc-lx7-compact-camera-review.aspx

I bought mine on amazon for $280 "used" from warehouse deals. The minor damage described was only on the box. The prices seem to have gone back up a bit though. I would suggest square trade insurance for whatever camera you buy.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B008MB719C/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1370800161&sr=8-1&pi=SL75

/u/grdnofjne - for your first real video camera I recommend something easy to use, with a built-in power zoom, a headphone jack and built-in neutral density filters for bright lighting conditions.

> I'm so confused by video cameras though, are they all digital or film?

Very few people shoot film anymore. Most still and video cameras record to digital SD cards.

Understand from your post history you're in Canada? If so, you might want to consider a [$1219.95 CAD Panasonic FZ2500] (https://www.amazon.ca/Panasonic-DMC-FZ2500-Digital-Camera-Megapixel/dp/B01N0J5UFA/ref=as_li_ss_tl?m=A2L8PJ8A72NL45&s=merchant-items&ie=UTF8&qid=1510297023&linkCode=ll1&tag=hybrcamerevo-20) with a built-in 20x power zoom lens.

You don't really need a more complicated interchangeable lens camera.

The FZ2500 can record at up to 4096x2160 pixel '4K' resolution and has:

• a relatively large 1" sensor for shallower depth-of-field than a traditional camcorder
  
  
• a headphone output
  
  
• built-in ND filters
  
  
• slow motion at up to 120 frames per second in full HD resolution (5x slow motion)
  
  
• upgradeability to the professional ["V-LOG" color profile] (https://www.amazon.ca/Panasonic-Function-Activation-DMC-GH4-DMC-FZ2500K/dp/B014U62K8E//ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=hybrcamerevo-20)
  
  
• splash-resistance
  
  
• 10-bit 4:2:2 output to an external recorder.
  
  Here is the image quality it can produce:
  
  120 fps slow motion in full HD
  
  
• [Boys Basketball - Bishop Gorman(NV) @ Sierra Vista(NV) - 12/05/16 First Half highlights by Ben Rowden] (https://youtu.be/5CXs-nFOa9s) (1080p)
  
  
• [Jaycee skatepark - Las Vegas - 01/6/17 by Ben Rowden] (https://youtu.be/tvbyepBp4xM) (1080p)
  
  
• [WRC ITALIA SARDEGNA - Slowmotion PS8 - Panasonic FZ2000 by Matordica Clips] (https://youtu.be/5LCCZuzqW2w)
  
  Travel
  
  
• [NEW ZEALAND / SOUTH ISLAND - Beach Edition - by Le Mon] (https://youtu.be/mYBAVoemXQA) (2160p - shot with the FZ2000 and a DJI Mavic Pro 4K)
  
  
• [Memories of Berlin FZ2000 FZ2500 by gordontago] (https://youtu.be/zRqlVgUqqxI) (1080p)
  
  
• [Panasonic LUMIX FZ2000/FZ2500 4K Video "The Greatest Journey in Hokkaido" by Martin Wallgren] (https://youtu.be/C-kaamEC8Ms) (2160p)
  
  
• [Panasonic Lumix FZ2000: prueba de video en 4K by Photolari] (https://youtu.be/Hfv_nl1ZRg0) (2160p)
  
  
• [Panasonic Lumix FZ2000 - first Impressions (Cinema 4k/UHD) by Sieben Leben] (https://youtu.be/60iStRO6cRA) (2160p)
  
  
• [48 Hours In Paris FZ2000/ FZ2500 by James Martini] (https://vimeo.com/191961649) (1080p)
  
  Wedding
  
  
• [Our wedding day. Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2000 by KOZTV1] (https://youtu.be/skaAg8F9QlA) (1080p)
  
  
• [G85 & FZ2000 by Aleksandr Epifanov] (https://youtu.be/YRQpfbX-iMA) (1080p - shot with the G85 and the FZ2000)
  
  Musical Performance
  
  
• [FZ2000 by Aleksandr Epifanov] (https://youtu.be/XFyJu-3Nvwo) (1080p)
  
  8-bit V-LOG
  
  
• [Panasonic FZ2500 V-log L test - Street Performer at TST by Chan Joey] (https://youtu.be/O1amqZ2V1IY) (2160p)
  
  
• [Panasonic FZH 1 / FZ2000 / FZ2500 V-Log Grading Exercise by Chan Joey] (https://youtu.be/n1LdQcLn9ms) (1080p)
  
  
• [Panasonic FZ2500 V-Log L Exercise-Japanese Style Videography by Chan Joey] (https://youtu.be/mnBGByLvxdM) (1080p)
  
  
• [Panasonic LUMIX FZ-2500 Vlog by Eric Nolin] (https://youtu.be/IMC3BRP-Sws) (1080p)
  
  
• [Panasonic Lumix FZ2000 / FZ2500 / V-LOG, Panasonic LUT, and IWLTBAP LUTs / Video Samples / 4K by Claudinchenchen] (https://youtu.be/B-HnSMW2cQM) (2160p)
  
  
• [Panasonic Lumix FZ2000/2500 - 4k UHD/V-LOG - Zoo Berlin - May 2017 by Sieben Leben] (https://youtu.be/3-x5mlSgKsE) (2160p)
  
  10-bit to an external recorder
  
  
• [Naturimpressionen von der Halbinsel Eiderstedt - in 4K/UHD by FZ2000/FZ2500] (https://youtu.be/keibYSRvjuA) (2160p - recorded to Ninja Flame)
  
  
• [Atomos Ninja Inferno試片-洪水坑水塘20171022 by 123 Wu] (https://youtu.be/w0f0PPx8R_A) (1080p)
  
  It's a capable still camera as well:
  
  
• [FZ2000/FZ2500 pool on Flickr] (https://www.flickr.com/groups/3064267@N21/pool)
  
  This camera will give you high quality stills and video for a reasonable price - and it will give you room to grow if you ever need advanced features such as LOG and 10-bit.
  
  If the FZ2500 is too much of a stretch for your budget, you might want to take a look at its predecessor, the [$879.95 CAD Panasonic FZ1000] (https://www.amazon.ca/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FZ1000-Digital-Camera/dp/B00KOUIBZW//ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&linkCode=ll1&tag=hybrcamerevo-20).
  
  This camera doesn't have a headphone jack, ND filters, or the 10-bit and V-LOG upgrades - it has a 16x instead of a 20x zoom and its maximum video resolution is 3840x2160 pixels instead of 4096x2160 - but it is still a great little video camera.
  
  Here are a few 4K videos shot with this camera (please watch at 2160p and your monitor's highest resolution):
  
  
• [FZ1000 Panasonic Lumix 4K ~ Sea] (http://vimeo.com/103562158) (4K)
  
  
• [Test Lumix FZ1000] (http://youtu.be/U0yQmT8FPtE) (2160p)
  
  
• [Mit Lilo auf der Trave durch Lübeck, Panasonic Lumix FZ 1000 4k] (http://youtu.be/3Y0GpRjPSkg) (2160p)
  
  And here it is at 1080p and 720p:
  
  
• [I'm new! by Sander van Schie - De Verfilmer] (https://vimeo.com/128004266) (1080p)
  
  
• [Test Panasonic Lumix FZ 1000 with Naama by zarchi10] (https://youtu.be/-t5AeIgu07k) (1080p)
  
  Weddings and Events
  
  
• [Lumix FZ1000 4K: Kelmarsh Country Show 2016 by Graham Barker] (https://youtu.be/_qmY-Egnyac) (shot at 4K, rendered at 1080p)
  
  
• [An Amsterdam wedding - Panasonic FZ1000 by Sander van Schie] (https://youtu.be/kqB5dGVCGCw) (1080p)
  
  
• [Lumix FZ 1000 Wedding Sample by Grig Cinema] (https://youtu.be/Q1M453A9Muo) (720p)
  
  Interviews
  
  
• [Dani Interview by Robin Horsley] (https://youtu.be/O-Ks7g4I7c0) (1080p)
  
  
• [Interview of Jolene Van Vugt FMX Female Pro Rider (Nitro Circus) by Nabil Fathi] (https://youtu.be/fkytRQEfEuk) (1080p)
  
  Green Screen/Studio
  
  
• [How I Use the Panasonic FZ1000 for Broadcast Use] (http://youtu.be/tE3yFeQg6BI) (1080p)
  
  Travel
  
  
• [ឣរគុណ by Mickey Coviello] (https://youtu.be/SuBWNtV-5cM) (1080p)
  
  
• [one week in Thailand with the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 by footageproduction] (https://youtu.be/pxgYrvmEA4w) (1080p)
  
  
• [Singapore city tour - AMAZING vlog 4k video ultra hd PANASONIC Lumix DMC-FZ1000 by ebs Video] (https://youtu.be/iGiopl3J7Ao) (2160p)
  
  Slow Motion
  
  
• [Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 TEST, 120fps, slow motion by Juan Moreno] (https://youtu.be/kjR_anlZeNU) (720p)
  
  And it's a pretty good still camera too:
  
  
• [Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Fan Club] (https://www.flickr.com/groups/lumix-fz1000/pool/)
  
  In my view, the FZ1000 is the best all in one camera below $1000 CAD.
  
  Hope this is helpful and good luck finding the right camera for your needs!
  
  
  
  

I'm looking for a camera that would be decent for starting to capture my life.

My husband and I are going on our honeymoon and I figured this would be a great time to think about investing in a good camera so I can start capturing memories. Here are some things I am looking for :

• A point and shoot camera that isn't complicated to use and is very simple for a beginner
  
• Under 700$ Budget
  
• A camera that is going to still be good x amount of years later, I want a camera that isn't going to be obsolete next year and is going to be good for awhile (like 5+ years), I don't know anything about cameras but if it's like any other technology a company will find a way to make it obsolete.
  
• A camera that I can take videos in, in good quality and have the ability to make videos from it to share if I wish. (think vlogging?)
  
• Up-gradable, for example, a camera that can put an extra memory card in, or purchase lenses for (if that's even possible, I know nothing about cameras)
  
• A Camera that's easy to use in terms of transferring data (pictures put on the computer)
  
• A Camera that I can do fun stuff with besides just taking pictures of my family. Like if I ever decide I like taking photos and I want to start looking into photography.
  
• A Camera that has the ability to be used underwater (this just seems like a little bonus to me, not needed)
  
  I was taking a look at this after reading a little bit of the buyers guide. I would read it further but it just seems a little too technical for me. Thanks in advance for any replies :)

Ok, if all you want out of your camera is for it to take nice pictures on a vacation, be less than 600 USD and be portble, your best bet is a high quality compact camera like the rx100 (note there are 3 successors to it for more money of course):

http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100-Sensor-Digital-Camera/dp/B00889ST2G

Will a point and shoot take good quality pictures? Yes. Point and shoots will fall behind DSLRs image quality in 2 situations: low light and printing large images. If you want to shoot in the dark or print poster sized images, you will need to look elsewhere (and probably spend a lot more than $600). However, since you say a smart phone takes nice enough pictures, you will probably enjoy the better image quality of a nice point and shoot, but not miss the ability to print posters.

Do point and shoots fit your budget? yes, I picked one of the most expensive ones as an example. A S100 is even cheaper and still a great camera.

Are point and shoots portable? Yes. They can often fit in your pocket without discomfort (depending on your pocket size of course). That is more than I can say about a M43 camera. They are smaller than a DSLR, but not so small you can carryone around easily without a bag.

Based on what I have read from you, I would bet a point and shoot would serve your needs better than a M43 camera. However, if you intend on making photography into a serious hobby (i.e. willing to poor more money into it over time for better lenses and bodies) and want to take pictures beyond vacation photos, then a M43 camera might be for you.

What you have to understand is that M43 cameras and DSLRs are meant to be paired with expensive lenses. Buying a DSLR or M43 camera and not buying nice lenses is a bit like building a nice house on a shitty foundation. In a few years your nice house will start to crumble and while you spend all your money keeping it standing your neighbohr who spent more on his foundation can spend his money on a new pool.


So, ask yourself what you want out of the camera. Do you just want it to take better pictures than an iPhone? Get a point and shoot. Do you want to make photography into a serious hobby? Get a M43 camera and some starting lenses.

Here are some good starting lenses:

http://thewirecutter.com/reviews/the-first-micro-four-third-lenses-you-should-buy/

Can you see yourself buying 2-3 of those lenses in the next year?

What kind of DSLR should you buy? A used one. Don't be too precious about brand names. For the first year, you're not going to know much about what you're doing, you're just going to be figuring it all out (well, I shouldn't speak for you...but that's what it was like for me. I'm a sloooooooow learner. ;) I'm a Canon shooter, and I've had good luck with them. You can get a used Canon t2i to get you started. Photography is less about the gear. It's more about the person behind the camera. Start simple. Save your money. Then, later, when you genuinely know what kind of shooter you are, what features you need...then blow a big wad of cash. I started simple and was glad I did.

If you want something smaller than a DSLR that travels well, consider the Sony NEX line, or other good small cameras that are all manual include the Canon s110 which will help you learn about about getting your camera into manual mode, which is where you can make better pictures. It's super small, and I carry it on my belt so that I have a wide angle camera with me even when I'm shooting on my DSLR with a zoom lens.

Keep in mind, there are plenty of great used DSLRs out there that will get you started. Here's a tutorial about buying a DSLR for less than a hundred dollars. Good luck, and happy learning! :)

What is your budget?

You say mid-range, so I am going to assume you mean AROUND $500-800, ish.

One of my favorite cameras at the price-point and which many of my street photographer friends swear by is the Ricoh GR, it is favorably compared to the more expensive Panny LX100, Sony RX100, the Canon G7X, the Nikon Coolpix A, and even the Fuji X100-series.

ANY of these would be good, my favorite overall for stills is the Fuji, my favorite for Video is the Panasonic, my favorite for performance versus cost is the Ricoh.

My favorite overall is perhaps the Sony RX100 III, it's video isn't as good as the Panasonic, but with the improved XAVC-S codec, it's FullHD is better than any of the other compacts. And it's stills compare very favorably to the much more expensive Fuji's, at a nice mid-range price-point.

Ricoh GR - $500-600, 16.2MP, Full HD Video

Fuji x100 - $600-900 (Used vs. New), 12.3MP, 720P HD Video

Fuji x100s - $600-950 (Used vs. New) 16MP, Full HD Video

Fuji x100t - $1150-1400 (Used vs. New), 16.3MP, Full HD Video (It's major additions are a rangefinder, and WiFi so you can communicate with your phone and use the phone as a trigger or upload the photos to your phone and upload them while you're still out on the streets, if the additions are worth it to you then great, if they are not, the x100s will provide you essentially identical stills performance).

Panasonic LX100 - $700-900, 12.8MP in 4:3 mode, 16.8MP total (it is a multi-aspect camera, so it can switch between various aspect ratios without changing field of view, that's a good thing), 4K Ultra-HD Video (4 times the resolution of the Ricoh or Fuji).

Sony RX100 II - $600, 20.2MP, Full HD video

Sony RX100 III - $800 - 20.2MP, Full HD video (With the addition of Sony's Proprietary and improved video codec XAVC-S)

Canon G7X - $700, 20.2MP, Full HD video

Nikon Coolpix A - $500, 16.2MP, FullHD Video

I'll second /u/Bester2001 and say the S110 is a great camera. It looks like you could get it for $200 right now. If you want to upgrade a bit more, I would pick the Sony RX100 (link: http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100-Sensor-Digital-Camera/dp/B00889ST2G/). It's more expensive ($500) but I think it's significantly nicer. It's still pocketable and small so no problems there. The great thing with this camera is you can get really great depth of field pictures. You know when you see pictures and the background is blurry? This camera can help you get some of those shots if you want. All in all, it's a great camera.

You can definitely keep either of these cameras for a few years and they're great for families.

I used to have a nikon, but I didn't like them that well. I've had 2 canons after that. I've loved them both. This is the new version of the camera I have.

I think you'd be fine with pretty much anything- make sure it has a good macro setting.

Take a piece of your jewelry with you to the store and take pictures with the different cameras you're looking at and see which one you like best.

Good luck!

you should check the canon S100: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-S100-Wide-Angle-Stabilized/dp/B005MTME3U, but it might be over your budget.

I used a couple of sony digital cameras too, one of them on the cheap end (around 100 pounds I think), the other is around 200 pounds. (I'm not from Europe so these are just rough numbers)

I like the more expensive one (my parents'), and I sometimes borrow it even though I have a Canon 40D. I was amazed by the picture quality of the cheaper one as well, it wasn't the greatest, but for the price it was really good and much better than any other equally priced camera.


I recommend doing your own research on these, and maybe going to the shop and trying some... here is what you should look for:

• Big sensor: some will have 1/2.3" , others 1/1.7", etc... since the number is inverted, the lower the number on the bottom the better (in this case the 1/1,7")
  
  
• High ISO with low noise: the big sensor contribute to this, as does some other technologies, like using CMOS instead of CCD, or backlighted sensor.. I'm not an expert in this, but that's where camera reviewing sites like dpreview come in handy.
  
  
• Stabilizer: optical stabilizer is a must for taking photos at low light conditions or while zooming.
  
  Maybe I missed some points, but these should be good indicators.
  
  Good luck :)

Hey there! I am a photographer who has my own media business, and I am getting more into the realm of exploring and practicing concert photography. I have been credentialed at a few events/shows that allowed me to use my DSLR and some great lenses, but most of the time I am in situations where I am not credentialed and can't take the DSLR, but still want to practice in the setting and get some great shots.

For about 8 months I've been using a Canon Powershot SX740 at shows, and it's been pretty okay for the most part. However, I am finding that at shows where I am WAY back, it's most definitely harder to get some good or even decent shots because of how the zoom works (I only go up to the digital zoom, I never use it) and how small the sensor is (1/2.3 inch I believe). I am exploring some other options of similar compact cameras that have TV or action modes, have decent sensors and zooms, that I could get away with taking into almost any show/venue. I have a few that I am looking into/considering (list below) but as I am more versed with the DSLR world and am not too familiar with technical aspects (especially how they change depending on the camera/format), I figured asking some more experienced professionals would be the best route.

Any suggestions or feedback is appreciated!

PANASONIC LUMIX ZS200

PANASONIC LUMIX ZS100 

Nikon Coolpix A900

Canon PowerShot G3 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II 

Unanswered question from the previous megathread

Author /u/ruby_skull - (Permalink)

Hey there! I am a photographer who has my own media business, and I am getting more into the realm of exploring and practicing concert photography. I have been credentialed at a few events/shows that allowed me to use my DSLR and some great lenses, but most of the time I am in situations where I am not credentialed and can't take the DSLR, but still want to practice in the setting and get some great shots.

For about 8 months I've been using a Canon Powershot SX740 at shows, and it's been pretty okay for the most part. However, I am finding that at shows where I am WAY back, it's most definitely harder to get some good or even decent shots because of how the zoom works (I only go up to the digital zoom, I never use it) and how small the sensor is (1/2.3 inch I believe). I am exploring some other options of similar compact cameras that have TV or action modes, have decent sensors and zooms, that I could get away with taking into almost any show/venue. I have a few that I am looking into/considering (list below) but as I am more versed with the DSLR world and am not too familiar with technical aspects (especially how they change depending on the camera/format), I figured asking some more experienced professionals would be the best route.

Any suggestions or feedback is appreciated!

PANASONIC LUMIX ZS200

PANASONIC LUMIX ZS100 

Nikon Coolpix A900

Canon PowerShot G3 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II 

Hi /u/RascalFirkin - the camera guide that /u/SerialManslaughter linked you to is very good, but a little out of date.

My recommendations really depend on your budget level.

CAMERA BODY BUDGET BELOW $500

I have two recommendations. Either:

1. A used Panasonic GH2, [starting at $457.48 in the Amazon Marketplace as of this post] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0043VE26U/?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&condition=used&creative=390957&keywords=Panasonic%20DMC-GH2&linkCode=ur2&qid=1407074812&sr=8-1&tag=battleforthew-20). There are also a couple available in the Adorama used store right now, one for [$399] (http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20652476.html?KBID=66297) and one for [$474] (http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20649718.html?KBID=66297).
   
   Here is what the GH2 can do:
   
   Feature Films:
   
   [Upstream Color - 2013] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00BMTX0SC/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00BMTX0SC&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20&linkId=D3IJQSCOWLWIXWKX)
   
   [Musgo - 2012] (http://vimeo.com/45596420)
   
   DOCUMENTARY:
   
   [Whitstable Dream] (https://vimeo.com/40029107)
   
   You'll find many more examples on Andrew Reid's Vimeo GH2 group here: https://vimeo.com/groups/gh2
   
   Or:
   
   
2. A [Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera for $495] (http://www.adorama.com/BMCCP.html?KBID=66297) (on sale until 8/31, when it will go back up to $995 - sale price not in camera guide). This camera requires a much steeper learning curve than the GH2 or any DSLR - but, straight out of the box, it will give you stunning RAW video images that no other camera in this price range can match. Here is what it can do:
   
   Narrative:
   
   http://vimeo.com/89563847
   
   Music Video:
   
   http://vimeo.com/88103618
   
   Documentary:
   
   http://vimeo.com/83284391
   
   Commercials:
   
   http://vimeo.com/95962309
   
   http://vimeo.com/81148562
   
   Corporate:
   
   http://vimeo.com/88080785
   
   CAMERA BUDGET BETWEEN $500 and $1000
   
   In this price class, I have two recommendations - neither of them are included in the camera guide.
   
   
3. You may want to consider the Panasonic G6. This camera is [$747.99 with the 14-42mm kit lens] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CFCTDD6/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00CFCTDD6&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20) and has a built-in intervalometer, a viewfinder that works while you're shooting video, built-in 'focus peaking' (makes your life easier when focusing manually), on-screen sound meters, compatibility with power zoom lenses, wi-fi control from your phone or tablet and many other features that make it a great video camera. Here is what it can do:
   
   Music Video:
   
   http://vimeo.com/88584840
   
   http://vimeo.com/84436275
   
   Narrative:
   
   http://vimeo.com/78037118
   
   http://vimeo.com/81339712
   
   Documentary:
   
   http://vimeo.com/97274302
   
   http://vimeo.com/73561266
   
   http://vimeo.com/87978429
   
   http://vimeo.com/78507820
   
   Slow Motion/Sport:
   
   http://vimeo.com/76503135
   
   Travel Video:
   
   http://vimeo.com/88543042
   
   http://vimeo.com/86145944 (shot with a power zoom lens)
   
   
4. If you don't want to bother with interchangeable lenses, but want the highest resolution images available in this price class, you may want to consider the Ultra HD resolution ("4K") [$897.99 Panasonic FZ1000] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00KOUIBZW/?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&condition=new&creative=390957&linkCode=ur2&tag=battleforthew-20). This camera has a fixed 16x power zoom lens on a 1" sensor, shoots at up to 1080/120p slow motion and can produce Ultra HD images that look like this (please watch at your monitor's highest resolution):
   
   http://youtu.be/lm3ULX-v04A
   
   1080/120p Slow Motion:
   
   http://youtu.be/nV8fqNvgnN0
   
   This is a very impressive camera for the price - and it is the easiest to use and least expensive large sensor Ultra HD camera on the market right now.
   
   Hope this is helpful!
   
   Bill
   
   
   
   
   
   

I own an Olympus PEN EP-1, a Lumix GH2 (hacked for awesome video), a Nikon D7000 (among the best of the cropped frame cameras) and a Nikon D800 (amazing for detail and also video.)

But I'm not going to recommend any of them, because it sounds like the following might be a better camera for you. It's a superzoom with a constant aperture of f2.8. It's a 12 MPx sensor with pretty good low light performance, and it shoots up to 1080p60, so the video is fine (although nowhere near as good as the hacked GH2.)

What makes this camera different? It's not a point and shoot, and neither is it a removable lens camera. The glass is very interesting -- it's a superzoom, going from 25-600mm equivalent with a Leica-badged lens.

This is a great compromise for someone who is still an amateur, and who doesn't want to go too deeply into the differences between primes and zooms, but who wants a quality camera that you can just go out and shoot, without too many compromises.

Here's a preview: http://www.dpreview.com/previews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fz200

And the Amazon link: http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-FZ200-Digital-Camera-Optical/dp/B008MB6ZX0

And some reviews and comments from a top-flight community of Panasonic camera hackers (who will certainly find a way to lift the 29 minute video recording limit): http://www.personal-view.com/talks/discussion/comment/77540

Now add a decent flash, a stable tripod, some memory cards, and a couple of ND filters (one graduated and one variable), and you've got a pretty good starting point. And I want to reinforce one point which is pretty important -- the f2.8 aperture is constant through the range of the zoom. You just won't see that with most other zooms out there in its class, and it's kind of a big deal. Plus the power-zoom makes using that zoom capability quite useful in ENG type work.

> will the AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.8G work on my Nikon D5200 flawlessly?

Yes. I'm mostly shooting on a DX camera with this lens as well :) It get's even better in this case, since the DX camera only uses the "inner part" (remember the crop) of the FX-lens, it only uses the sharpest part. Most lenses are sharper in the middle and get a bit less sharp on the outside. In this case, the smaller sensor actually becomes an advantage!

The 50mm 1.8g is a great lens. Really very good for portraits and everyday photography. Very sharp and the bokeh is delicious. Just keep in mind it will get a little bit tight for indoor scenes. Outdoor is no problem, because you can always move further back, but inside, -for example a group shot - can get a bit difficult.

> can also be applied on small sensors like the ones on mobile phones and digital compact (who always are showing off with their g2 aperture ) at this rate it will become f1000 hahaha

Yes, totally! Actually, with the compact point-and-shoot cameras this is sometimes kinda regarded as a "scam". They are using the physical aperture as an advertisement (f2.8) as well as the crop factor when it comes to focal length (a maximum 2,000 mm), but they don't mention that the crop factor has to be applied to the aperture as well for the bokeh and iso performance. They basically only mention the positive sides of the sensor...

Of course there is no 24-2000mm F2.8 - F6.5 lens with a minimum focussing distance of 1cm like they are suggesting. That is simply physically impossible with a 35mm sensor size. Those numbers only apply to a very tiny sensor and are therefore worthless

> would it be a good lens for videos too

To be honest i'm not into video. I can tell you the autofocus is fairly silent, I can barely hear it at all. If you want reliable information on the video side of things, I recommend asking over at https://www.reddit.com/r/videography/ . They will probably tell you to manually focus but just ignore that and read what they say about the lens lol.

Wow, you're being super generous right now!! Thank you so much for this, whoever you gift is so lucky <3 If reddit raffle chooses me I'd love a camera or this iPod (there's a used one from the Amazon warehouse for $110 with all the standard accessories)! Or seriously, whatever things from my expensive things wishlist you want to gift me--there's a bunch of $50 things, so two of those would be just as amazing.

Good luck on your 10k!!!! I'm training for my first ever 10k in August, you have to let me know how it goes! Girlsplaywow is a jerk (except not really)

The kit lens can definitely fit, but depends on the jacket pocket. Typically if you're carrying it on the go, you want some flexibility with your gear, I'd go with the kit lens.

If you're looking into just a compact camera though and don't plan on buying any more lenses. Look into the Sony RX100 Line. Compact powerful cameras with a zoomable zeiss lens. Will definitely fit into any pocket. It also has a selfie friendly flip screen :D I recommend anything between the 3rd and newest edition so you get that flip out screen. It takes great pictures too!

RX100 III (oldest model with flip screen)

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Premium-Compact-F1-8-2-8-DSCRX100M3/dp/B00K7O2DJU/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1539353104&sr=8-2&keywords=rx100&dpID=41mW-DoHAGL&preST=_SX300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch

RX100 VI (newest model)

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Premium-Compact-24-200mm-DSCRX100M6/dp/B07DKG29RG/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1539353261&sr=8-5&keywords=rx100&dpID=41Aq4mL0fxL&preST=_SY300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch

The best camera you can get for around that price would be a Canon G12, it's $450 but it would be worth it. It has full manual controls, and is very solid. You can use the optical viewfinder or you can use the LCD on the back.

Look up some reviews if you need more info.

If you want a ridiculous amount of zoom, get this camera. In my opinion it has way too much zoom, and I don't think the photos will be as nice, but you'll have more freedom in terms of zoom. I don't think manual focus will be as easy on this as it would be on the G12.

If you want to be able to change lenses, get this camera, the E-PL1, if you want to be able to change lenses, and don't mind having a prime lens (i.e. don't need zoom), get this GF3.

The GF3+14mm lens is on special right now (for 2 more days I think, according to 43rumors.com), and you won't get zoom, but it will take muuuuch sharper photos, in less light, than the other cameras. And you can buy a zoom lens to put on it if that is what you need.

That GF3 package is $320... the lens by itself costs $300. The camera is basically free if you buy that package, which is why it's currently #1 this week on the amazon compact camera sales.

A 14-42mm zoom lens to go with it, bought separately, would only cost $129.

I would suggest a high-quality compact camera like the RX100 line from Sony. The Mark III is $750. If you want to save money you can get the mark I for $450 (the III has a better lens). Don't get the mark II, it's an in-between model not worth the extra money.

Another outstanding camera is the Fuji X-T20 with 18-55mm kit lens for $999. The extra $250 over the RX100 M3 is worth for the excellent colors that come out of a Fuji (everybody is in love with them) and the ability to change lenses if you'll ever need to.

00You can also get the RX100 M1 for $250, RX100 M3 for $400, RX100 M6 for $900 and the X-T20 for $900 from Amazon Warehouse. They're open box items in very good condition, with Amazon's money back guarantee.

SECTION | CONTENT

--|:--
Title | Old Jaffa, Tel Aviv || YI 4K+
Description | Old Jaffa in tel aviv, Shot on the YI 4k+. at 1080/60. Check out my other videos shot with the YI4k+ Leave a comment, like and subscribe! Program used : Premiere Pro Adventures by A Himitsu https://soundcloud.com/a-himitsu Creative Commons — Attribution 3.0 Unported— CC BY 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/b... Music released by Argofox https://youtu.be/8BXNwnxaVQE Music provided by Audio Library https://youtu.be/MkNeIUgNPQ8
Length | 0:04:17


SECTION | CONTENT

--|:--
Title | Tel Aviv Gay pride Beach party, A look inside || Yi 4k+
Description | A look inside the Tel Aviv gay parade beach party. Sorry for bad audio, the little camera cannot handle such loud noise! I hope you enjoy this, and gives you a peek how it looks like from inside
Length | 0:08:17


SECTION | CONTENT

--|:--
Title | Yi 4K+ 4K/60fps Action Camera vs GoPro Hero 5 Black vs Sony FDR X3000 — In-depth Review [4K]
Description | 339$ Yi 4K+ Shoots 4K 60FPS 135MBPS video so is it a GoPro killer, is it the best action camera out there? Not really. Here is why. Link to the product: Yi 4K+: http://amzn.to/2q8U3WX My Cameras Sony RX100M5: http://amzn.to/2mQvgos Sony RX100M4: http://amzn.to/2nngzWz Sony FDR-X3000R: http://amzn.to/2k5gXZL (with live view remote) Sony FDR-X3000: http://amzn.to/2jihs5c (no live view remote) GoPro Hero 5 Black: http://amzn.to/2ms21WG Hey! You look beautiful today. Thank you for watching my vid...
Length | 0:12:19






****

^(I am a bot, this is an auto-generated reply | )^Info ^| ^Feedback ^| ^(Reply STOP to opt out permanently)

Honestly, if you have a budget that low and REALLY can't borrow or rent from anyone or anywhere in your area, PLEASE don't get a flip camera with that money. You can get a decent point and shoot that shoots basic HD video (no manual focus though) but good quality otherwise. Look into this for now, I just bought this for my friend's birthday and she absolutely loves it.

Canon Powershot ELPH 300
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-300-HS/dp/B004J41T7Q

Some nice features for video...

Shoots in 1080p
24 frames per second, which gives it that "film" look.
Pretty good wide lens for a point and shoot

Let me know if you have any other questions about the camera! In my experience Panasonic and Canon seem to be the best for video in these point and shoots.

The Canon Powershot D10 is a great camera. I've had one for a year or so, and we use it as our every-day point and shoot. It's done quite a bit of water work. Mostly kids in the pool or the lake. I don't dive but it's rated to 33 ft. The hinges/seals are good quality, you just have to keep them free of grit.

The only thing I don't like about it is the video mode is SD, not HD, and video doesn't have a continuous autofocus. Even with that the video is pretty darn good, and the stills are reliably great, both out of water and in water (water-clarity dependent). IMO it's absolutely worth the $300.

Thank you for submitting to /r/SmallYTChannel. You have spent 3λ to submit here, making your current balance 0λ.
/u/nah123929, please comment !givelambda to the most helpful advice you are given. You
will be rewarded 1λ if you do so. For more information, read the FAQ.

Video data:

Field|Data

-|:-
Title|I caught my NEW PERSONAL BEST BASS! (BASS FISHING)
Thumbnail|Link
Views|38
Length|11:17
Likes/Dislikes|7/0
Comments|4
Description|I spent some time at the creek, caught a new species and a bunch of sunfish before heading to the pond and catching my new pb!⤶⤶Thanks for watching!⤶⤶Big shoutout to Chris from CK Outdoors for helping out, check out his channel!⤶⤶https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCotnuzFsJsexvjdXM7Lx9kQ⤶⤶Fishing Gear:⤶⤶$10 Spinning Combo - ⤶⤶https://www.walmart.com/ip/Zebco-Slingshot-Spin-Fishing-Combo-Medium-2-Piece-5-Ft-6-Inches-Length/16652601⤶⤶Baitcasting Rod - ⤶⤶https://www.basspro.com/shop/en/berkley-lightning-rod-casting-rod⤶⤶Reel -⤶⤶http://www.quantumfishing.com/icon-pt-baitcast-reels.html⤶⤶Bait Used (Junebug) - ⤶⤶https://www.basspro.com/shop/en/strike-king-rage-tail-craw-soft-bait-lures?hvarAID=shopping_googleproductextensions&affcode_c=&gclid=Cj0KCQjwi7DtBRCLARIsAGCJWBpGZv2zHDlp72zNCt4QHkrgoMHHoabt1rrA1CUVM5TbIk3hpmyp_18aAoqkEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds⤶⤶Camera Gear :⤶⤶Big camera - ⤶⤶https://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-Digital-Camera-Screen/dp/B01BV14OXA⤶⤶GoPro Hero 5 Black -⤶⤶https://www.amazon.com/GoPro-HERO5-Black-Waterproof-Digital/dp/B01M14ATO0/ref=sr_1_4?keywords=gopro+hero+5+black&qid=1571599727&s=electronics&sr=1-4

##Channel Data:

Field|Data

-|:-
Name|HookBeFishing
Thumbnail|Link
Subscribers|32
Videos|10
Views|426



^/u/SmallYTChannelBot ^made ^by ^/u/jwnskanzkwk. ^PM ^for ^bug ^reports. ^For ^more ^information, ^read ^the ^FAQ.

WSIWT: Chromepak Trumans for the baby shower. I'll update with a picture later if possible.

AOTD: Probably any number of Vibergs from the sample sale. I had just gotten into better footwear and couldn't see why they were so great. Also, I had just picked up a pair of Aldens at full retail so I was tapped out shoe budget wise. Hopefully they don't do this upcoming sample sale in Japan and I can get one of you great fellows to proxy for me!

GD: Pretty sure I'm set to get the Sony DSC-RX100M III for my camera purchase. Anyone know of a better place/price for it? My limited Googling hasn't shown much better pricing and Amazon returns make me feel good.

Is your moon criteria because you want to be able to zoom really far or that you feel only decent cameras can do that? I ask because if you don't need a long reach you could put more money toward a better camera/lens that's shorter.

If you don't need long reach and want a small camera a used RX100 will give you great quality for stills and video for under $400. You mention travel so I think for walking around it's great. It's a fixed lens though so you can't get more out of it down the line.

If you're thinking of it more like an investment and you'll grow into it over time you'll probably want to go with an ILC (interchangeable lens camera). Mirrorless will be smaller DSLR will be bigger. Just know that you're buying into a whole ecosystem because because lenses aren't swapable between brands. There are adapters but generally you lose things like auto focus unless you pay big bucks for an adapter.

For DSLR a used Nikon D3300 or Canon T6 is under $400. For mirrorless a used Sony a5000. There's also the micro 4/3's mirrorless systems but someone else would have to chime in for recommendations as I have no experience w/ them.

I should note that all my specific recommendations don't have a ton of reach (can't get far subjects). But what you save on that gets you incredible quality if you take the time to learn. Also w/ the ILC cameras you could get a telephoto lens in the future. You could get a cheaper body and get a kit that has 2 lenses one of which is a telephoto - used Nikon D3100 Kit or used Canon T5 kit for right at $400. You have to swap lens to go long. If you really want that zoom for cheaper or smaller overall size probably look at choices in this article.

That said if you're going to stay on auto mode all the time my recommendations are probably not worth the price premium since you won't get the most out of it. Save some bucks and get a point and shoot that's easier to travel with and you're more likely to take out and use. I will say the quality gap between camera phones and point and shoots is pretty minimal these days. You probably need to spend $300-$400 for the significant jump in quality.

My recommendations

All of these meet your resolution and frame rate requirements.


Rx100
this camera is very conveniently sized. it has a non interchangeable 24-70 lens but it is a really good lens. In your case it would be great since its small, light, and takes really nice photos and video. It also has image stabilization and insane auto-focus. One of the reasons this camera is so popular is the slow motion capabilities. If you want interchangeable lens the a6300-and a6500 carry the same sony auto focus that is just rediculous.


G85
Finally this camera is geared more towards video people. It has the least mega pixel count of the two but with the no low pass filter it still can go head to head in pic quality with the other above. One of the biggest features of this camera is the image stabilization, it will blow you away. In addition to IBIS it also has great auto focus and the best touch screen available of a camera, its also sealed and can with stand a "camping" environment.

The fuji is basically a compact camera in a slr-like body and not the best value. There are some decent bridge cameras similar to that one but they usually cost over $300.

If she only wants to spend $200, I'd recommend something like this Canon or something in the Panasonic Lumix line - possibly the FH25 or the ZS8.

If she shell out a little more money, there is a great deal on the terrific [Canon s95] - all my camera needs are taken care of and yet I am tempted to get one at that price.

Hi /u/Cortexian0 - You don't have to spend that much money for high quality video. For [less than $900 you can get the Ultra High Definition (UHD) "4K" Panasonic FZ1000] (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00KOUIBZW/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00KOUIBZW&linkCode=as2&tag=battleforthew-20). This camera has 4 times the resolution of the CX900 or 7D Mark II and the same 1" sized sensor as the CX900. It is also a great slow motion camera - recording at up to 1080/120p. The CX900 and 7D Mark II are limited to 1080/60p.

You can "crop" a 4K picture to 1080p in the editing suite to make it look like you're shooting with more than one camera - or you can "zoom" to make it look like you have a camera operator - as in this example (please watch at your monitor's highest resolution):

http://youtu.be/TV3mTlTL07g

In addition to its superior resolution, this camera has bulletproof autofocus and is right in the middle of your price range.

Here are a couple more examples of what it can do:

http://youtu.be/MivSKRpLKAI

http://vimeo.com/103562158

This is an amazing 4K video camera for the price. The only downsides are that it lacks a headphone jack and, like the 7D Mark II, it is limited to 30 minutes of continuous recording before you have to hit the record button again to re-start the shot (so if you need hours of continuous recording, this isn't the right camera).

Good luck!

Quick question - do you want waterproof as in can go underwater or waterproof as in can withstand rain? If you want underwater I would personally go with the Canon PowerShot D10 12.1 MP Waterproof Digital Camera with 3x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.5-Inch LCD. It's rated to like 33 feet I think. My friend has one and the reviews on Amazon are phenomenal.

If you're going underwater PLEASE buy a nice wrist strap. You WILL drop your camera otherwise. OP/TECH USA 1801021 Cam Strap QD- for Compact Cameras and Binoculars -Neoprene (Black) is relatively cheap and has the added bonus of having a quick release. This means you can keep the strap on and just release the camera if you need to. This is really convenient if you're wearing gloves. If you get a second strap for a friend then you two can conveniently pass the camera back and forth and just click it in and not worry. You definitely don't want to lose a new camera and you certainly don't want to lose the memories.

Hello Everyone! I need advice on buying a camera. Please and Thank you in advance! I am going to Thailand for my honeymoon in April. I have a 7 year old Samsung Point & Shoot that is very slow. And I don't want to rely on my phone to take pictures. So therefore I want to buy a new camera. I want something that takes good quality pictures, Zoom really is not THAT important to me IF it takes a lot away from the quality of the image. I also want to take HD video as well. I have looked at the Buyers Guide and it seems a lot of the cameras that I am interested in fall into the "Super Zoom" Category, (such as the SX-700) which seem to be limited in picture quality if I understand it correctly (Correct me if i am wrong). I am looking to spend about $299. Is there anything in between the S-100 and S-120? I don't need to stick with Canon, if someone has some good recommendations i would love to hear them.


Canon S-100

Canon S-120

Canon SX-700 HS

Overall I'd say the lumix is a great camera. But my experience, Canon's are easier to use, my personal recommendation would be the CANON POWERSHOT S110 they are on the same level, a major plus its almost $200 cheaper and the image quality is superb and equal if not a touch better esp in color reproduction and clarirty. http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-Powershot-S110-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-LX7
With the fast apature and larger sensor than most point and shots. Night time photography shouldn't be an issue. Just like any camera even lower end mid range DSLRs the question is how much light you have and are u going to use a flash or tripod.
<br>
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-Digital-Camera-3-Inch/dp/B009B0MYSQ. - best place to find new and a great price too. Also as it has advance modes like Apature Priority and manual mode, learn how to shoot using those lodes vs Program and auto to get the most out of the camera.

Edit: Added amazon listing and tips

I'm guessing amazon decided to be a creeper after I was searching for this camera for you...so I figured I'd share what they emailed me with. best deal ive seen on the s95 (so far at least...I'm not looking too hard lol). And this one might be the newest model in that series. I stand by the canon power shots because they've always been better than the nikon point and shoot cameras (even though I'm bred to be a Nikon DSLR kid)...and I assume having HD video is great. I'd go into a store to experience the audio quality first hand though.

Edit: typos

EditEDIT: Basically what you want are manual controls so you can handle low light situations (that 2fstop option is NICE) and a lot of flexibility with exposure while still maintaining a quality image. I know jack shit about sound but from what I understand the video capabilities on DSLRs and possibly point and shoots (esp like this one) are getting better and better as time goes on. Plus its a tiny, lightweight model...safer and easier to bring to events without breaking it.

wonderful cameras... very small... can put in your pocket.

I have the rx 100 iii and its a challenge for me to use... I have large hands and 64 year old eyes .... when I have my reading glasses I can see the settings a bit better.... but this is probably the best pocketable camera out there for that price range.

Assuming u are a lot younger than I am with good eyes... its a nice deal for you if you want to travel light

​

amazon warehouse has a whole bunch of em used for under 500

https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B00K7O2DJU/ref=dp_olp_0?ie=UTF8&condition=all&qid=1573100162

ignore this comment, just a temporary step to make sure I have the formatting right before I paste it into the FAQ.

| Price | Used Mirrorless | New Mirrorless | Used DSLR | DSLR
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| under $100 | original NEX 3 (body only) | | |
| $100 - $200 |NEX F3, Nex 5, Nex 5R, Fuji X-E1 (body only) | |Canon 20D, 30D, T3 (body only), Nikon D3100 (body only), Sony A500 |
| $200-$300 | Fuji XE-1, Olympus E-m5 or E-m10 (body only) | | Canon T5, T3i, T2i|
| $300-$400 | Sony A5000, A6000 (body only) | |Canon 5D mark 1, 1D mark 2, 60D, T6, SL1, Pentax K-5 II/III, Nikon D3300, D7000 |
| $400-$500 | Ricoh GR | | | Nikon D3300
| $500-$700 | Fuji XT-1 | Sony A6000, Fuji X-A3| Nikon D700, D7100, T5i, T6i, 7D| Nikon D3400, Pentax K-50, K-S2, K-70 (body only), Canon SL1, T6, T5i
| $700-$1000 | Fuji X-T1, Sony A7| Fuji X-E2, Canon EOS M5, Olympus OM-D E-M5 II (body only) OM-E E-M10, Panasonic GH4 (body only) | Nikon D600/610, Canon 6D, 5DII, 80D | Pentax K-3ii (body only), K-70, Canon 70D, 80D, Nikon D7200
| $1000 - $1500 | Olympus OMD-M5 II, Fuji XPro2 (body only), Sony A7R | Fuji X-T10, Sony A6500, Panasonic G80/85, GX8 (body only)| Canon 7DII, Nikon D750, D800, Sony A99 | Pentax K-3 ii, Canon 6D, 80D, 7D2
| $1500 - $2000 | Sony A7s | Sony A7ii, OM-D E-M1, Fuji X-T2, Panasonic GH5 | Canon 5DIII, Nikon D810 | Nikon D750, D500, Pentax K-1 (body only)
| $2000+ | | Sony A7RII, A7SII | | Canon 1DX II, 1DC, 5D IV, 5DS, 5DS R, Nikon D5, D810, D810a, Df, Sony A99ii

| Price Range | Point & Shoot | Mirrorless | DSLR |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| $0-100 | Budget compacts. See the Snapsort ranking for suggestions. |||
| $100-200 | Mid-range compacts and superzooms. See the Snapsort ranking for suggestions.|||
| $200-300 | Some older premium cameras like the Canon S100. || Used models 7-9 years old. |
| $300-400 | More premium cameras like the Canon S120, Panasonic Lumix LX7, or Fuji XF1. | Micro Four Thirds systems like Olympus PEN or Panasonic Lumix G | Used models models 2-5 years old. |
| $400-500 ||| Used mid-tier models 4-6 years old.|
| $500-700 | Top-end point & shoot like the Fuji X20 or Sony RX100. | APS-C systems like Sony NEX or Samsung NX. | New entry-level models. Used full frame models. |
| $700-1000 ||| Mid-tier models like the Canon 60D or Nikon D7000. |
| $1000-1500 || Premium systems like Fuji X or premium Micro Four Thirds like the Olympus OM-D EM-5 or Olympus OM-D EM-1. ||
| $1500-2000 ||| Entry-level full frame models like the Canon 6D or Nikon D600. |

If your don't wanna get a dslr and your just getting into Vlogging I would get a Sony RX100 - great camera, good price.

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100-Sensor-Digital-Camera/dp/B00889ST2G

Check out Sara Dietchy's video below..its old but she talks about it and gives some good info. she's a pretty well known vlogger and she has been using it for a while (even tho i believe she recently switched)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6Rfton2P4E - starts talking about the camera around 8:30

Hope this helps!

Y'all have so many subreddits and a question thread that I wasn't sure where this would go. I'll delete anything that's in the wrong place!

I'm looking at buying a camera in the next couple of days (actually have been for a few months now, but I'm very indecisive) and am currently looking at the Canon ELPH 300 HS and the Olympus PEN E-Pl1. I'm wondering what you more experienced folks would recommend.

DPreview comparison

Snapsort comparison

Canon on Amazon

Olympus on Amazon (shoot, they were both $10 less last week)

I'm being told to spring for the Olympus for the bigger sensor and the ability to change lenses (a friend has offered to loan me lenses for it), but I'm not sure if it's what I need or overkill. I've photographed a bit, but want to learn and practice more.

If I get the Canon I'll definitely be putting CHDK on it. Would that put it a bit more on par with the Olympus? I'm a little concerned about the stated shutter lag on the Olympus.

Ideally I'd like to order in the next few days so that it can arrive before spring break.

I apologize for the "what should I buy" question that gets asked all the time, but here we go.

I'm looking at the RX100 M3 and the A6000 with 6-50mm and 55-210mm lenses

I'm a 100% total beginner and I want a camera to capture basically everything (travel, family, outdoors).

From what I can see the RX100 is only better for portability, and I'm 100% okay with a bigger camera for better pictures, but are the two lenses included enough? I'm okay with potential buying one more, but I would like to keep it to the two.

I'm also open to other suggestions!

Any reason why you can't use rechargable AA's?

Otherwise, there's a couple good options for you. It boils down to two types of cameras - compacts, and SLR's.

Compact cameras are like what everyone used to have until they all just started using their phone instead. They're small, portable, unobtrusive, and light - but typically have poor controls. You'll find some that have manual controls, but they'll typically be difficult to set or change. (There are exceptions, but most of those are much more expensive models)

SLR's are the "big" cameras. It stands for Single Lens Reflex - basically, it uses a mirror to reflect the image through a viewfinder. When you take the picture, the mirror slaps up (that characteristic click sound) and the film or sensor is exposed. Digital ones are DSLRs, and I'm sure you can guess what the D stands for.

You can get a film one (very cheaply found online or in second hand camera stores) or a digital one. These cameras tend to be much bigger, more noticeable, and more expensive. Lenses are detachable and therefore sold separately, though most come with a standard or "kit" lens. However, they have many advantages - controls that are operated more quickly and easily, higher image quality, better autofocus, etc.

I prefer DSLRs, but you may not - and neither of us would be wrong.

$250 bucks should get you a couple years old entry-level model with the kit lens. On the Canon side, you're looking at the XSi, the T1i, or maybe you could find a deal on the T2i. I'm not as familiar with Nikon's lineup, but I'm sure you could find something a couple years old there too.

If you prefer the compact, there are some older model ones that work well too. The SX260 is in your price range, though for a bit over 300 you could get the S100. I've heard very good things about the latter.

A Pentax camera is a pretty good choice. They're not as popular as their Canon/Nikon counterparts, but they're always loaded with tons of features, especially for the price. The K70 is their newest midrange body (came out just 2 or 3 months ago) and the reviews have been decent so far.

As for the point and shoot you linked, I would say the G9x is one of the best point and shoots out there. I would certainly pick it over anything sub-$300 and I think it's well worth the extra $200. It's competition would be the Sony RX100, however for the same price I think the G9x is a bit of a better choice.

The sony you suggested is not a bad choice, but beware- sony is notorious for their digital cameras "smudging" fine detail. It will be fine for a 5x7, but 8x11 or larger will be pushing it, even at your cameras maximum quality.

I know it's outside your price range, but consider the Canon SX260.

For the extra $38 over your budget, you get one of the best travel compacts there is. And it consistently ranks as among the sharpest compacts there is. And since I don't think there are any cameras below $250 that really fit the bill, I think this might be best.

If you looked at nearly all vloggers and most youtubers before a few years ago, almost everyone was shooting on shooting on flip-cameras or small cameras like this.

The reason you don't see as many people shooting only with cheap cameras is just because if you are going to spend dozens of hours every week creating videos it just makes sense to have gear that makes it easier. Especially if those videos are getting you a pay check. It's like saying you can build a house with just a hammer and hand saw. While technically true, if you were actually serious about building a house you'd save yourself a ton of time and trouble getting power tools and other equipment to do the job right.

Here's a video from Casey that he shot on his iphone. Recently Samsung has sponsored a bunch of youtubers who have made videos using only their phone. In the end it comes down to whether you can tell a good story or not.

Look for a used Sony RX100. There are 6 generations of them, at various price points. Used, they go from a bit over $200 for the oldest one to around $1000 for the VI (6). Considering you were going for a D3400 (new), I assume your budget is around $350, which means you can definitely go for gen 2 (RX100 II) or even gen 3 (RX100 III). It's safe to get one that says "Amazon Warehouse" because they offer warranty and returns.

Why the RX100 instead of a DSLR or mirrorless? The sensor on the RX100 may be smaller than those (about 1/3rd of them) but quite a bit larger (4x) than the sensor on a smartphone or compact/bridge camera.

But most importantly, the RX100 is small enough to fit in a pocket. Even the smallest mirrorless you can possibly get will still be 2-3 times larger than the RX100, and a DSLR like D3400 is huge by comparison. This convenience means you are most likely to always have it on you, which is literally the first and foremost thing about photography.

Video
>12X optical point and shoot with amazing low-light performance.

That pretty much disqualifies zooming on every P & S camera. Typically zoom lenses have a max aperture of f5.6 or greater at the longest end. This problem is made worse by the tiny sensor built into p&s cameras.

Also...

Audio
>the mic was crap and you couldn't hear anything over the amazing bass (I heard a paper tape over the mic can help in these cases!).

Sound pressure at concerts is way too high for clear audio on the built in mic of any p&s or even a DSLR camera. To record clear audio during a show you'd could try getting an external digital recorder (like a Zoom H1 audio recorder), record the audio and video separately, then re-sync them in your video editing software. See what I'm talking about >HERE<

I figure you want a p&s to keep your setup small, discreet, and allowable at a concert venue, so all DSLRs are out in this reccomendation.

So, what you'll need to do is this:

• Get p&s camera with a fast lens (f2.0 - f2.8) Try the Canon 500 HS for $200 or the Canon S95-s100 for $400ish
  
• Get digital audio recorder (Zoom H1 for $86)
  
• Get good seats
  
• Forget about zooming so you can get a decent image
  
• Record video and audio seperately
  
• Combine video and audio in your video editing software
  
• Be happy?
  
  Note* - If you must zoom, you need to stabilize the camera (preferably a tripod or monopod). If you cant use either cause of the venue, then tuck your arms against your body tight, and hold the camera with two hands. In any case, your video is still gonna look like crap if it's zoomed, grainy (cause the camera will raise the ISO to try get a decent exposure), and jerky (cause your holding the camera with one arm above the crowd).
  
  

I personally use a nex-5n and it's great. the kit lens is a solid performer it just doesn't have many lens options right now. The fuji and gx1 are both solid performers. I would lean more towards the fuji personally. Also the Olympus xz-1 is a great little point and shoot with full manual controls, a great lens ( u can get a solid depth of field from it) and can be had for about $300. It also has a hot shoe so if u wanted to get an off cameras flash u could.

Edit: The x10 is on amazon for $420 here

If you ask for suggestions on this sub, people are always going to suggest DSLRs. It sounds like you don't want to be carrying around a big camera if you're living in one bag. I'd suggest a compact system camera like the Olympus PEN a Sony NEX a Panasonic LX7 or a Nikon 1.

You won't get the exact same quality as a DSLR, but the size is 1/3rd that of which you'd have to carry on your back, and they will certainly take good pictures.

Enjoy Asia, and if you come out to Taiwan, send me a message!

Not cheap but I highly recommend the rx100 m2.

I travel full time and when my big camera met the ocean I got one of these and I've been more then impressed. Great low light shots, very versatile and the nfc feature lets you easily take pictures of yourself using a smart phone as a remote (use a gorillapod)

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DM8R866/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00DM8R866&linkCode=as2&tag=redditdiscount-20

Hey guys I'm planning on buying my first camera soon, but i don't know a lot about cameras. Im interested in getting a compact camera instead of a DSLR camera. I'm torn between the Samsung NX200! and the Fujifilm X10!. Both are on amazon and under $400. My question is which camera takes better pictures? Any feedback is appreciated!

I looked into cameras several years ago before we did some big vacations. I ended up getting a Sony Cybershot RX100. I love it. It can essentially be a point-and-shoot, or you can use it in manual mode if you want to step up your photography game. This camera went to Australia, Iceland, and Finland with us and we love the photos it took. If you want a step-up from your cell phone but don’t want to go as big/fancy as a DSLR, this one is a great compromise.

Edit: misread and saw you already have a regular camera. This one still does a good job with video! It might make sense to combine picture camera and video camera into one product, less to have to keep track of.

I have a Huawei Honor 6x, its supposed to have better night quality since it has an extra 2MP camera just to catch more light

Still eyeing one of those Motherf*ckers though, the zoom would be fun to play with, dont know if it good for videos though

I have two that I really like.


The first is In Memoriam. I shot this at the Vietnam Memorial around Memorial Day weekend with my point and shoot (saving up for a DSLR). I was just trying to get a neat shot of some of the names in focus and looking down that wall. It wasn't until after I had taken it and was looking at it at home that I saw the woman mourning in the background. It's not the best framing in terms of thirds. I could probably crop it some to make it look better, but this is the original.


My other favorite is a tropical kingbird. I took this picture in the ruins of Tulum in Mexico at a distance of maybe 30 yards with the same point and shoot camera. The fact that it's not blurry at all amazes me. That little camera is pretty awesome for a point and shoot.


I used a Canon Powershot SX 260 HS.

HX400V - $468

FZ200 - $447

RX100 2 - $498


Here's an album I took with the HX400V, RX10 and RX100 (1) on Safari for comparison.

If you need something pocketable, don't waste your time looking at anything but an RX100 1 or 2. The only real differences between the two is the ability to wifi connect to your phone and a hot shoe. They will take identical pictures.
If you want something with full range from landscape to portraits and need a full zoom - don't waste your time looking at anything else but the two above. The Canons/Nikons come close but the Zeiss lens on the HX400V is better and the 2.8 aperture on the FZ200 is better.

I highly suggest the Canon Elph 300 (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-ELPH-300-HS/dp/B004J41T7Q ) you can buy it on amazon for 149.00 this camara offers great a great set of features and even an HD video mode. Read the reviews online: most all of them are positive.

I'm a Canon girl when it comes to cameras. I have a Canon PowerShot SX130IS which is a few years old already, but I love it! I think they are up to 170 in that series by now.

I bought that because I wanted something with a big zoom, that wasn't an SLR so I could still take it into concerts. It wasn't very expensive (I think I paid $150 for it at the time) and it takes AA batteries, which I like because if my battery dies I can easily find more.

As for polish pictures, I just use my Galaxy S5 camera.

Renting a good camera doesn't necessarily mean that you're going to get good pictures; how good you are with a camera and how much you are willing to learn are the most important factors. If you're looking into a DSLR then you need to take time to learn the camera and what settings to use when before you depart. Additionally, you'll probably need to get a better lens for it as well (whether renting or buying).

I guess what im trying to say is if you want a DSLR you need atleast a few weeks learning it + $1000 entry cost if purchasing, if you go for the low end model (Rebel XS body and, lets say, Tamron 18-270mm 3.5-6.2 VC Lens with rebate) and Understanding Exposure (http://www.amazon.com/Understanding-Exposure-3rd-Photographs-Camera/dp/0817439390/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1310284264&sr=8-1 ) is a highly recommended book for learning how to get started.

I don't know renting costs near you.

If you're looking for something less sophisticated but still want some power behind your punch look into something like the SX30IS (http://www.amazon.com/Canon-SX30IS-Digital-Optical-Stabilized/dp/B0041RSPR8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1310284110&sr=8-1) or http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SX130IS-Stabilized-3-0-Inch/dp/B003ZSHNG8/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&qid=1310284168&sr=8-10

I would say an x100s is about as user-friendly as a mid-level DSLR. There is no full auto mode like you'll find in an entry-level DSLR (like the Canon Rebel series). You would certainly be able to get decent pictures without advanced photographic knowledge, although you wouldn't be using the camera to its high potential; if you don't want to think too much about the process of taking the picture, you could get a good P&S like the Canon PowerShot and save some money. The x100s would be a great camera to learn on, though, in my opinion.

I went with a http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100-Sensor-Digital-Camera/dp/B00889ST2G

It's very small, does low light well, and can do pretty decent zoom. It's what I'm bringing to con

This thing fits in a pocket so easily.

Unfortunately, it plus a large memory card is going to way bust your budget. Then again, since getting it, I've taken it many places I'd not have done so beforehand.

I recommend this book on it if you do get one:

http://www.amazon.com/Photographers-Guide-DSC-RX100-Alexander-White/dp/193798608X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1376431070&sr=1-1&keywords=RX100+book


You might be able to find a used 5N and some cheap lenses of Ebay, but that's going to take some work:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B005IHAIMA/ref=sr_1_3_olp?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1376431152&sr=1-3&keywords=5N&condition=used

and will be a bit of an issue to lug about.


Now, if this is really more of a hard budget than a "trying to save money on a hobby", something like a http://www.amazon.com/Pentax-X-5-silver-Digital-Stabilized/dp/B0091TC3OC will get you the zoom shots (it's not a DSLR, but looks like one), but I have no idea on any of the rest of your requirements.

Perhaps visit a camera store near you that stocks both, and check them out?

That said, read a book about shutter speeds, etc, so you learn how to eek out every little bit out of your camera. A little knowledge will make your camera considerably better than it's 'mode' settings may do for your condition. Practice before the con.

Keep in mind that that camera has a very wide lens, so everything you shoot will have a fisheye effect. I personally recommend something like a [Sony RX100 Mk 2](Sony DSCRX100M2/B 20.2 MP Cyber-shot Digital Still Camera (Black) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00DM8R866/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_wH1yybWV7GDW7) or a similar point and shoot. Obviously for action stuff this is not ideal but the quality will be way better for the vlogs and other normal things. PLUS, that camera takes amazing stills (if you're interested in that).

I'm still trying to figure out why the D50 and D70 are so similarly priced

Cameras appear to lose their value more slowly over time, and eventually reach about ~$200, which is about as low as you'll find a working dSLR.

So my question is would the extra $100 or so be worth it for the DSLR/Lens over the point and shoot or would the quality of the images be too little to notice the difference

Depends on what you're trying to do. A modern point and shoot will probably offer video and, possibly, better low-light performance in some circumstances. A DSLR with a 50mm prime will offer much better bokeh, decent low-light performance, better flash performance (if you buy a flash), and, probably, more manual controls (for, say, very long or very short shutter speeds), as well as manual focus (if that becomes important).

If I were in your shoes, I'd probably try to stretch for a Canon s95 or s90 (about $250 used or refurb'ed). But then, I value the portability; if you value the other features (especially the ability to produce bokeh in pictures of people), an older dSLR will serve you better.

I have a Sony RX100 (first generation one), and love it. The pictures are great considering it isn't a DSLR or mirrorless camera, and it is fairly compact which makes it perfect for hiking and traveling.

Phones have been replacing point and shoots like this, not point and shoots like this or this.

Phone cameras have small sensors, and those cheap-o $50 Walmart point and shoot cameras do too, so phones are eating them alive since the performance is so similar. Higher-end point and shoots, however, have more features, larger sensors for better low-light performance (where phones struggle and will continue to struggle if they don't put in larger sensors), better handling, AF tracking, etc. It's no longer worth it to spend $100 on a camera, a phone will do better, but if you're investing in something higher-end then it's going to be something that you'll notice is better than phone cameras. The RX100-series is a very popular lineup for its combination of performance and compactness.

Craigslist (or eBay, as others have suggested). You can find older DSLR bodies and kit lenses for around $200. I'm guessing a Canon EOS 20D or Digital Rebel XT. Maybe an XTi depending on prices in your area. In central Florida, I see 2 Rebel XTs for $200 or under; One of them is a great deal with 18-55mm and 55-200mm lenses AND an a Sunpak Flash (doesn't say what model) for $200.

I've seen some amazing deals on Craigslist. Two years ago, my dad got a Canon 40D with 3 lenses (one of which was a 28-135mm IS USM) for $400. The lens alone cost more than that new (and about a month later, he snagged one for me for about $200... again off of Craigslist). Some people just want to get rid of stuff, have no idea what its worth, or overestimate depreciation.

You don't have to buy a spiffy DSLR now, but if you can buy a cheap one with a couple lenses, you can still use the lenses when you finally are able to buy a spiffy new body (assuming you stick with the same platform, of course).

Just make sure you test out the camera and lenses before you hand over your money!

EDIT: If you just want a compact camera right now, check out the Canon PowerShot SX130 IS or SX150 IS. Both are under $200, and offer Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, and Full Manual controls, as well as manual focus. I'm not sure if they have a "bulb" mode on the shutter (i.e. - it stays open as long as you hold down the release), but the standard longest shutter speed is 30 seconds.

Here's a review of the SX130 IS, and one for the SX150 IS.

Bear in mind that most compacts with manual controls are really designed for ease-of-use in manual mode, so you may have a lot of looking at menus, holding 2 buttons down at the same time, or various other quirks when adjusting aperture and shutter speeds with most compacts that offer those features.

Buy the sony RX100M III is great for low light, is easy to use, and the sony cameras get you really good results with out knowing any of the settings. http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00K7O2DJU/

An other camera that would get the job done is the sony nex 5t, is bigger and has interchangeable lenses but again you can use it in auto mode and it would work well, it has also great low light performance http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00ENZRP38/

The sony nex 5t has better image quality and low light performance, is just bulkier.

Now this is a bit higher up on the reasonably priced range, but I have recommended this camera to several of my friends and customers and they have all been pleased with it. 14.1 Megapixels, 12x zoom, 3' screen, still fits in your pocket, and has a manual mode for playing with more advanced techniques. The downside is that it takes 2 AA so a few sets of rechargeable batteries would be a must.

At around $400USD I would say you have three options:
Sony RX100 MkI, a Go Pro or your phone.

The S7 has decent camera quality, and while the RX100 will be more durable, I would opt to save the money instead. Image quality from the RX100 might be a little better (you'll definitely have more control over the image).

The Go Pro could definitely work. Those things are built like tanks, my mate takes one hiking and records some nice time lapses and video. However, image quality is poor (probably worse than your phone) and the fisheye effect looks out of place for a hiking video.

IMO, save the money until you have enough to get the RX100 MkIII/IV which will be a noticeable upgrade from your phone.

Edit: Also, the S7 has expandable storage, throw a 32GB micro-SD card in there and that'll be you set for storage.

I have owned the Canon S90 (most recently replaced by S120), Sony RX100, and Ricoh GR. My personal favorite is the Ricoh GR due to its large sensor and superior all-around performance. However, my recommendation would go to the Sony RX100 since the Ricoh GR has a fixed lens (28mm equiv). If price is more of an issue, the Canon S110 is a great pocket camera and going for only $250 now, which is half the price of the RX100.

I got this camera and love it.

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100-Sensor-Digital-Camera/dp/B00889ST2G

Just don't get a big bulky DSLR. A lot of point and shoots these days are shooting great quality photos with HD video. And nice and sleek to fit into a pocket. I also have a little admin pouch type thing I can wear on my kit to slip my camera and other things into so I lessen the risk of banging it on something.

Newbie here. Looking for a good camera I can also take when I travel. Should I get the Sony Alpha a5000 or Sony DSC-RX100M III?

I was originally oogaling the DSC-RX100/B but the M III has the flip-up display which I want. It's also +$300 more than the /B. This Black Friday Ad shows the /B on sale for $50 off, which is a pretty piss-poor sale. But it shows the Alpha a5000 for $100 off, which is more appealing. Should I grab the a5000 or is the /B or M III much better?

I have been looking at different sites for the p900. The official stores like best buy and amazon are selling for $600 and third party sellers are selling for $500-$550 what is the difference between the two?

here are some examples of what I mean

$600:

https://www.amazon.com/Nikon-COOLPIX-Digital-Camera-Optical/dp/B00U2W4JEY/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1538873836&sr=8-3&keywords=p900&dpID=41UDqzxXwuL&preST=_SX300_QL70_&dpSrc=srch

​

https://www.bestbuy.com/site/nikon-coolpix-p900-16-0-megapixel-digital-camera-black/4961288.p?skuId=4961288

​

Under $600:

​

https://www.walmart.com/ip/Nikon-Silver-COOLPIX-P900-Digital-Camera-with-16-Megapixels-and-83x-Optical-Zoom/44553207

​

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIABKX6KF5160&ignorebbr=1&nm_mc=KNC-GoogleMKP-PC&cm_mmc=KNC-GoogleMKP-PC-_-pla-_-Point+%26+Shoot-_-9SIABKX6KF5160&gclid=Cj0KCQjwuuHdBRCvARIsAELQRQEZobkWHFKCjFJWm5pj4lLxd5iHFzU_hW90lTWp0RsjBoOy1l2ALS4aApmFEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds

While that's a great camera, If you don't need underwater ability I would go for something else. I was very happy with my Canon Powershot SX260 HS. This was a few years ago and on amazon it says OLD MODEL so there is probably a newer one. They're both great cameras but you will sacrifice a little bit in order to make the camera waterproof. That being says OP took some damn good pictures. Plus it always seemed someone I met traveling would have the underwater camera OP used so I would use them for water shots :)

Canon S95 can be had for around 250 I believe.

Oly E-p1 about 200 with lens

Sony Nex 3 about 350 ish

Fuji S4200 A bit cheaper still

Hard to narrow it down any with the only known criteria being sub 500 dollars. But the above are all (in my opinion) very good cameras for the money. I'm a fan of buying used because you can get a little bit more for your money since digital stuff just depreciates like crazy.

I think for an upgraded P&S the Nikon is a solid camera as well. You can nab it used for a pretty deep discount.

I've always had good experiences with Canon cameras. Even the point and shoots give you pretty good manual control.

The clincher for me is that the Canon has the 'wink timer' -- so when you wink at the camera, it starts the self timer :)

The Sony RX100 has a great reputation as a budget video camera, but it's a point & shoot so it might not make the best option depending on what you want to teach. I think you can get a couple of Canon 60Ds on your budget if you want to teach camera-work specifics.

Do you want to teach cinematography or storytelling? For camera specifics, you might want to shop for more sophisticated cameras than the RX100. If you want to teach storytelling techniques, then you don't need a 60D for video; just about any smartphone will do. Depending on the smartphone, a few 60Ds may be cheaper. :)

You might like the Panasonic FZ-200.

Link: http://amzn.com/B008MB6ZX0

Also check out this sticky post about asking for camera recommendations - it'll help us narrow down what would be the best fit for you: https://www.reddit.com/r/videography/comments/441owv/a_template_for_those_looking_for_their_ideal/

The G9 and G11 may cost $700, but the G12 is only $419 at Amazon.

If Canon refuses to repair your camera, I'd say you're pretty much out of luck. Although, you could always show them the pictures to prove that the scratch is worth repairing.

Option 1: Use your phone.

• Get one of these ($35) and one of these ($20) to cover your stabilization.
  
• Get one of these ($40) to keep yourself powered up.
  
• Grab two or so of these ($38 for two) to make sure you don't run out of space.
  
• And get something like this ($23) so your audio doesn't completely suck.
  
  Option 2: Buy a Canon S110
  
  
• Still get the $20 pistol grip for stabilization
  
• Still get some SD cards (this takes normal SD rather than micro SD so they should be cheaper. Make sure they're Class 10 for speed!)
  
• Probably still get some cheap microphone.
  
  Edit: There are cheaper versions of things like the travel battery (though I would still stick with this brand and get something smaller), the SD cards, etc. if you want to pinch more pennies.
  
  Edit 2: If you're worried about durability, see if you can find an Otterbox case for the phone as well.

Well, I'm not familiar at all with that camera (or even Sony as a camera brand) so it may have a lot more features than you're aware of (the user manual is your friend!) that would allow you to make better pictures. I will say that I know as far as point-and-shoot cameras go the Cannon S95 is a very nice camera cause it gives you a lot of nice options that you would normally only find on much higher end DSLR type cameras. It's pretty damn expensive at ~$350 for a point and shoot camera though. Being a photographer is very expensive as a hobby I can attest as my mom is a semi-pro photographer and has spent a shitload (that's a technical term in photography) on all her camera gear.

That's exactly what I'm looking for - a simple point and shoot that's waterproof and will withstand occasional drops and such. This has been super helpful, thanks so much!

Also, just to make sure, this is the Canon you're talking about, right?

We have this one and its pretty awesome - nice quality pictures and (so far) unbreakable.

Depends what your budget is

Sony DSC-RX100 is a great camera and pretty much considered the best non-interchangeable lens camera. This is the older version but still very similar to the newest.

Panasonic LX7K

Panasonic LF1

Nikon P340

these are all considered better cameras

I use a panasonic lumix. I think this one. Not quite as advanced as a DLSR, but much better than a point and shoot. But if I had the option of picking a camera instead of being gifted this, I would have probably just went ahead and spent the money on a Canon Rebel since it's not that much more expensive.

Lighting is everything in photographing makeup! Sitting by a good light source can make even a phone camera look amazing.

For what it's worth, you can get the S110 on Amazon for $249 US.

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-Digital-Camera-3-Inch/dp/B009B0MYSQ/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1415236466&sr=8-1&keywords=canon+s110

The S90 is a great camera, and the S110 builds on that. If you aren't looking to jump into an SLR or an expensive mirrorless camera, simply upgrading your S90 to an S110 might yield results that make you happy.

It depends on what you're looking for, though. If you want to drop some more money and get something that's a bit less "point and shoot" and a bit more "control over the end product" then something like the Fuji X100S might scratch your itch.

I'd go with the Sony RX100 V.

• Yeah it's quite expensive, but you won't have to spend anything on lenses. Although it leaves you with a fixed lens.
  
  
  
• The RX100 is really compact and great for capturing photos and videos. Just watch some reviews on youtube (e.g. autofocus, review by Sara Dietschy, also ok for [underwater footage] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6l9yWjoUNk) and astrophotography).
  
  
  
• If you don't rely on the new autofocus you could even go with the much cheaper models III and IV, but I think the V is worth it.
  
  
  To sum up I think you'll use a this compact cam generally more over a DSLR and also worry less about breaking the lens or handing it over to other people to take footage. (Kinda casey's mindset about gear.)

at the time, I heard it was one of the best point and shoots you could get, the Sony RX100 I kind of love it. :)

i have this sony camera, but i just dont wanna carry it around. i bring it with me on special occasions only

just the phone is super convenient.

Ya so the the blurry backgrounds are basically products of really wide apertures on a camera lense, and it really is all about the lense in this regard.

With your camera you can't change lenses and that's gonna be the main issue. Your camera only goes to f/4.5 which is a very common limit. However to get the shots you want you would need to have a DSLR body and a prime lense that brings your aperture down to *f/1.8 or something similar.

You can buy full cameras with built in lenses that are not interchangeable and even compact with something like an f/1.8 range. But they tend to be a little more expensive and limit lense options obviously. This is really cool though Fujifilm X100 12.3 MP APS-C CMOS EXR Digital Camera with 23mm Fujinon Lens and 2.8-Inch LCD https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0043RS864/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_UQabAbVMM6FZN

My suggestions.
1.) For now the best thing you can do on your gear is take photos from father away from your subjects. If you can access manual settings make sure your aperture is as low as the number will go. (that may mean compensation with shutterspeed or ISO) Google it.
2.) Go on eBay or Craigslist and pick up an older Canon or Nikon DSLR body. I sometimes see old D60s for like $60 online and sometimes they come with a lense. But you really don't want the lense that comes with the camera anyways so don't worry about getting them together. Once you find a body, go online again and buy a prime lense with a 1.8 aperture. This guy isn't the best lense ever. But it ain't bad. $50

YONGNUO YN50mm F1.8 Standard Prime Lens Large Aperture Auto Focus Lens For Canon EF Mount Rebel DSLR Camera https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00QEXM4YC/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_4TabAb4AB8AZ8

And thats how you go pro with under $150.

First off, congratulations OP!!!

According to the EXIF, it was taken with a Sony DSC-RX100.

I'm wondering if OP actually fiddled with the Program AE settings (half-press shutter and select settings), or just set it to P and clicked.

The composition is great, as is the lighting (which I'd guess is a lucky accident given my recent experience shooting in a hospital room). Without a good camera sensor, the image quality of this picture would've looked like noisy garbage, though. (Was noise reduction applied in Photoshop or is the Sony that noise-free at ISO800?)

Ok, just need a tiny point and shoot for my wife to carry around in her purse. Right now have it narrowed down to these two:

Canon PowerShot ELPH 300 HS

and

Panasonic DMC-FH25K

They seem fairly similar from what I can tell. The lumix does 720 video while the canon does 1080, but not a deal killer. Also the lumix has a bit father zoom, but 5x is probably plenty in most cases for this application. Our canon sd1200is worked fine for two years taking pictures plenty good enough for our needs, but now the lense is stuck open. Anyway, if anyone here knows more about the specs, if one of these has the edge I'll gladly take suggestions. I'm no photographer, but would like something that is decent for the buck at least.

Private pilot and semi-professional aviation photographer here. I've been using Canon dSLRs for over 10 years. Over the past couple years I haven't had as much time for photography due to other pursuits, so I sold my 5D and 7D and got a T5i, which is still good enough to get the occasional magazine cover and National Geographic picture ;]

That having been said... While flying, an SLR is almost always too bulky. If I'm the only pilot on board, I leave the Canon on the ground. My favorite compact camera is the Sony RX100. I'm among the many people (1, 2, 3) who think it's the best compact camera ever made. For some samples, check this out.

When I need more zoom, I use a Panasonic FZ200. I've been a huge fan of the FZ series since the original came out 13 years ago, and I have one for occasions where I need lots of zoom but can't bring the 100-400mm lens. It's f/2.8 all the way, i.e. the fastest (and just about the sharpest) big-zoom non-SLR camera you can buy.

So those would be my recommendations.

Even $300 is a small budget for a nice compact, at least by current standards. You'd need to look used. Image quality is first of all about the size of the sensor. The Canon S100/110/120 has a little larger than average sensor, definitely a step up from camera phones, and as mentioned can perhaps be had used starting under $150 (they're not available new). I would myself look at a used Fujifilm X10, which is a step up in quality and a delight to shoot with. It has an even larger sensor than the Canon and produces, like all Fujis, spectacular images right out of the camera. It also has a very fast lens for low-light photography. You can get those used off of Amazon Marketplace for about $250.

What about a P&S like a Canon PowerShot? They make really high quality video, can go in any standard camera mount (tripod, etc.) and you get a good still picture camera as well. Pay extra for a faster SD memory card vs. cheapos - they're worth it.

Or if you're ready to spend the bucks, look at a newer Nikon or Canon SLR that can do video. Several commercial movies have been shot on the higher-end SLRs.

Powershot s100

It's small enough to fit in my pocket but packs a nice zoom and full manual controls :)

I was looking for a similar camera and decided on the Canon Powershot D10 (available at Amazon) - I haven't bought it yet, so I can't offer a review of it's quality.

According to Canon's material, it's has 12.1 megapixel sensor and is waterproof to 33 feet. It's operating temperature is 14-104 degrees F, and it's shockproof to 4 feet. It's also got 3x optical zoom and image stabilization, as well as all sorts of onboard software features.

It has a solid 4-star rating on Amazon, with 55% of those reviews being 5-star.

My wife and I added it to our baby registry - we're going on a vacation to Hawaii in February, and we figure once our little boy is old enough to start using a camera in a few years, one that's shock, temperature, and waterproof probably wouldn't be too bad of a starter camera - you know, so he can be like his dad :)

have you thought of the Sony RX100 ii? I got one for the same reasons you listed above and I love it. Tiny and great shots. Decent sensor too and in your price range.

Thanks!

The travel budget depends on you. For Europe and Eastern Europe it was about 6ish months and I went through around 6000$ Canadian. Phillipinnes was actually fairly expensive for Asia and by the time I got to Australia to do working holiday I had about 2000$ left. By the time I left after 10 months I was back up to 12,000$ and the rest of the time was in Southeast Asia so it was gravy.

The camera I used was the Sony RX-100 (first generation). I think they are up to the fifth now. I managed to snag it on sale on amazon for like 400$

Pick up a used Fuji x100 on Craigslist or eBay. You can find one for $550-850, depending on its usage, scratches, etc. It has a fixed lens (23mm that's a 35mm equivalent) so unfortunately you won't be able to use your existing lenses. Hiked with it through Mexico for a bit -- it'll fit in the pocket of hiking pants easily enough, though you'll know it's there. Lovely IQ.

This is one that I really like!

This is an updated version of the camera I used to have that was rockin'. There's probably an even better version, but I didn't do any research. :)

I'll make it easy for you: You want a (used) Sony RX100 III.

https://www.amazon.com/Sony-Premium-Compact-F1-8-2-8-DSCRX100M3/dp/B00K7O2DJU

The RX100 was the beginning of Sony's takeover of the entire camera market, from enthusiast level all the way up to full-frame pro cameras. They somehow now have a bigger market share than Nikon OR Canon. I don't know what possessed them to decide they wanted to be The Best Camera Company, but right now they're it, and the RX100 is one of the reasons.

In your shoes I'd go for the RX100 III, they switched from a 28mm-equivalent to a 24mm-equivalent on the wide end which is a non-trivial difference for taking landscape shots. It's $650 new but you can find a ton of used ones for $400ish.

Obviously the RX100 IV, V, and VI have upgraded features but I don't think any of them would be worth it for you on that tight of a budget.

Sony Alpha a6000 ($750) vs Sony DSC-RX100/B ($500) vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 ($550)?

I'm a total noob and looking to get my first decent camera. Mostly just need a camera for when I travel - nothing fancy.
In order of importance: Durability > Ease of use > Portability.

Amazon links: Sony-RX-100, Olympus OM-D E-M10 and Sony a6000

Is the price difference to the a6000 worth it?

If you are wanting to vlog on it and record yourself, I would really look at that a6400. I have an a6300 and it is a great b camera for me on my gimbal. I have used it in the past for vlogging but you are really shooting blind since you cant check to see you are in frame or in focus. If you are on a budget I get it. Another good budget sony vlogging camera is the RX100. Those run about $400 on Amazon https://amzn.to/2SHo23E Hopefully this helps!

This one gets good reviews. Looks like it has good video performance for you, too.

I like to leave my DSLR at home also. I carry around a Canon Powershot SX150. Bought it off a friend and have been satisfied with the pictures I've taken. Here are some shots from a hike earlier this year.

I've had a Canon s95 for two years now and it's an amazing camera. It has a shorter battery life that I was used to, but that was solved with a spare battery.

The new model s110 seems to be on the same line, it has auto mode, but also full manual control, plus all the in betweens, AV, TV...

Also, GPS, that you seem to like.

Here it is in Amazon.

I just bought a nicer point and shoot to test the waters of photography. I shot this on manual, I plan to try to get a good feel for all the settings. Any advice/critique would be greatly appreciated!

My camera: http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SX130IS-Stabilized-3-0-Inch/dp/B003ZSHNG8

If this ends up becoming a thing you really enjoy, I highly recommend a camera with video stabilization. There are a ton of fancy things you can use (including plug-ins), but a good point and shoot may be all ya need.

Is it this? Says that it's 1.41 thick. That's pretty close to the perfect option for me provided it's thin enough.

I've had the Sony HDR XR-160 since 2011 and have only had one problem with it, the "buffer overload". Here is a clip of test footage. I also have some footage from a really embarrassing videos on YouTube, but I don't want that to be seen...

The Canon Vixia series of camcorders is often fine. I've never used them, but have heard great things from them. Also, with the Canon name, you can expect to get the good optics and quality from the higher quality Canon cameras.

Worst case scenario, and I wouldn't really recommend this, you could use cheap Canon point and shoots for video. Vloggers, video bloggers, use them for their decent quality, and small size. An example of the point and shoot video quality is the CTFxC which is shot entirely on Point and Shoots, same with the Shaytards.

The Canon EOS M could be a great beginner "DSLR" for you. DSLRs can give more types of looks than camcorders.

Given that you specifically asked for "cheap", I think the people recommending SLRs for you are probably out of your price range.

If you want a really good point-and-shoot that will take reasonably good low-light photos, I'd go with the Sony RX100:

http://www.amazon.com/Sony-DSC-RX100-Sensor-Digital-Camera/dp/B00889ST2G

If you're going to be doing a lot of outdoor photography that requires an extended zoom range, I'd go with one of these two, depending upon your schedule and your budget:

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SX510-Digital-DISCONTINUED/dp/B00EFILPHA/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1407123773&sr=1-1&keywords=PowerShot+SX510+HS

http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Powershot-Digital-Camera-Optical/dp/B00M0QVTOS/ref=sr_tr_sr_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1407123786&sr=8-1&keywords=PowerShot+SX520+HS

I have been looking at the Canon G12. From what I have read it's one of the better point and shoots for underwater. The only caveat is that the Canon underwater case you can buy for it has some bad reviews about leaking. That being said I was looking at picking up the Ikelite case for it, but it costs more than the camera does. All in you would be a little over $1000 US, but you would have a great consumer set up.

That camera didn't get very high user review. I'd consider this one. I have an SX200 and it is built like a tank and takes great pictures.

If resolution isn't an issue and you're ok with small/blurry shots (you could still see form, it just would be on-par/lower-than SD quality, far from HD) then you could get something like the Canon PowerShot S100

I just found this clip from searching YouTube, to give you an idea of the image quality.

If you wanted to capture 200-240fps at 1080p, you'd be looking at a camera like the FS700 for $8k.

For the Canon s95, do you mean this?

Your help is more appreciated than you know!

None of the cameras you listed are that compact unfortunately. Look into the a6000, it's at the top end of your price range.

To be honest, I'd suggest something like an RX100M2 instead of an interchangeable lens camera. It'll last forever and it has everything you need in a super compact package. It's more capable than any of those Canons and it has NFC in addition to Wifi.

While it's not a camcorder, I found the Canon G7Xii to be a fantastic alternative to a camcorder. Much higher quality and you can get some good pictures, too, for video thumbnails and whatnot.

I have one of these (currently on Amazon for about 180 dollars) and it takes the best photos I've ever taken with a point-and-shoot. The 1-star reviews aren't accurate for my experience with it. I've kept it in a case in my purse for a couple years now and never had any problems with it.

DSLR: Nikon D3300.

Pocketable-smaller: Best Sony RX100 version you can afford. This package comes with two batteries. You will need at least two.

Advantage to a dslr is better pictures (in theory and mostly) disadvantage is size - you won't want to take it out to regular events.